<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forget Time Machine and Mozy! Jungle Disk is my backup of Choice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/10/13526/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/10/13526/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:32:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/10/13526/comment-page-1/#comment-711555</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 23:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13526#comment-711555</guid>
		<description>Backblaze is the best option for online backup from a mac at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Backblaze is the best option for online backup from a mac at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Burris</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/10/13526/comment-page-1/#comment-668032</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Burris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13526#comment-668032</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dan!  This is a comforting endorsement. I finally got around to using JD after seeing the Rackspace acquisition news yesterday. I&#039;ll sleep much better knowing my backup is not in the same location as my  data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dan!  This is a comforting endorsement. I finally got around to using JD after seeing the Rackspace acquisition news yesterday. I&#8217;ll sleep much better knowing my backup is not in the same location as my  data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Scott</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/10/13526/comment-page-1/#comment-644439</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 19:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13526#comment-644439</guid>
		<description>I back everything up with time machine.  I use JD+ to backup pictures, source code, and important documents (99% of my documents I run through my fujitsu scansnap document scanner and then shred)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I back everything up with time machine.  I use JD+ to backup pictures, source code, and important documents (99% of my documents I run through my fujitsu scansnap document scanner and then shred)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Punsalan</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/10/13526/comment-page-1/#comment-642872</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Punsalan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13526#comment-642872</guid>
		<description>+1 for Jungle Disk Plus from me. Started using it again a few nights ago. The initial upload for an entire directory backup is a bit of a pain though (unless you have incredible uploads). After that, incremental backups of only changed files is good. 

I&#039;m even considering setting up a separate bucket for hosting images on my site. There are a few things that I&#039;m unsure about though for the hosting part... 1) latency (S3 is awesome for storing and retrieving large files but what about smaller items hundreds of times per hour?), and 2) people outside of the US or who use some type of adblocking may get images blocked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 for Jungle Disk Plus from me. Started using it again a few nights ago. The initial upload for an entire directory backup is a bit of a pain though (unless you have incredible uploads). After that, incremental backups of only changed files is good. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m even considering setting up a separate bucket for hosting images on my site. There are a few things that I&#8217;m unsure about though for the hosting part&#8230; 1) latency (S3 is awesome for storing and retrieving large files but what about smaller items hundreds of times per hour?), and 2) people outside of the US or who use some type of adblocking may get images blocked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/10/13526/comment-page-1/#comment-640077</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 07:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13526#comment-640077</guid>
		<description>I use plain old Jungle Disk, but I also backup via home-brewed scripts that AES-encrypt all the files in .RAR archives before uploading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use plain old Jungle Disk, but I also backup via home-brewed scripts that AES-encrypt all the files in .RAR archives before uploading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/10/13526/comment-page-1/#comment-639209</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13526#comment-639209</guid>
		<description>I love JungleDisk.  While it&#039;s not the most economical choice, it allows archiving (which Mozy does not).  I figure for about $10 per month, it&#039;s well worth the comfort of knowing that everything I&#039;ve ever created and all of my music + photos are safely (and securely) stored elsewhere.  I&#039;ve already been burned once by a stolen laptop.  Now I won&#039;t have the heartache of losing everything again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love JungleDisk.  While it&#8217;s not the most economical choice, it allows archiving (which Mozy does not).  I figure for about $10 per month, it&#8217;s well worth the comfort of knowing that everything I&#8217;ve ever created and all of my music + photos are safely (and securely) stored elsewhere.  I&#8217;ve already been burned once by a stolen laptop.  Now I won&#8217;t have the heartache of losing everything again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: acidscan</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/10/13526/comment-page-1/#comment-639093</link>
		<dc:creator>acidscan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13526#comment-639093</guid>
		<description>Jungle disk made such a mess with my buckets on amazon that i&#039;ll never use it again. Mozy is way simpler, easier and better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jungle disk made such a mess with my buckets on amazon that i&#8217;ll never use it again. Mozy is way simpler, easier and better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JEFF</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/10/13526/comment-page-1/#comment-639083</link>
		<dc:creator>JEFF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13526#comment-639083</guid>
		<description>The problem is most of these sites only transfer at kbits, not kbytes.. takes forever to xfer you&#039;re data

cough Mozy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is most of these sites only transfer at kbits, not kbytes.. takes forever to xfer you&#8217;re data</p>
<p>cough Mozy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
