<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows XP Gets To Live Another Day (Or Three to Be Exact)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13263/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13263/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:17:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13263/comment-page-1/#comment-452337</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13263#comment-452337</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s stupid because Microsoft is only _partially_ reacting to public pressure (of people not being able to do what they need or want to do with the latest version of Windows.)

@Matt:  If it&#039;s just as functional, why is it that enterprise businesses have NOT picked it up yet, Microsoft&#039;s Windows division has posted a drop in this year&#039;s sales (even though computer sales are up) and even the U.S. DOT has BANNED it from their networks?  Just because it&#039;s pretty, does not mean it&#039;s _functional_.  (I&#039;ve seen pretty Yugos...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s stupid because Microsoft is only _partially_ reacting to public pressure (of people not being able to do what they need or want to do with the latest version of Windows.)</p>
<p>@Matt:  If it&#8217;s just as functional, why is it that enterprise businesses have NOT picked it up yet, Microsoft&#8217;s Windows division has posted a drop in this year&#8217;s sales (even though computer sales are up) and even the U.S. DOT has BANNED it from their networks?  Just because it&#8217;s pretty, does not mean it&#8217;s _functional_.  (I&#8217;ve seen pretty Yugos&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13263/comment-page-1/#comment-450726</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13263#comment-450726</guid>
		<description>Three days? This is ridiculous now. Either people need to leave XP behind, because in all honesty Vista is just as functional as XP, or Microsoft needs to realise that some people don&#039;t want Vista. Either way this whole &quot;end of XP life&quot; shit is just stupid now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three days? This is ridiculous now. Either people need to leave XP behind, because in all honesty Vista is just as functional as XP, or Microsoft needs to realise that some people don&#8217;t want Vista. Either way this whole &#8220;end of XP life&#8221; shit is just stupid now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
