<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Become a Time Machine Power User with Bootable Backups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13250/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13250/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:32:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: not-convinced</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13250/comment-page-1/#comment-490578</link>
		<dc:creator>not-convinced</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 01:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13250#comment-490578</guid>
		<description>Nice thoughts to get around of an apparently OR bad TM architecture *1) OR TM designed like that by purpose *2).

*1)
A real-live backup of a production or &#039;homemade&#039; system only is of real-live use if you can be &#039;back&#039; (restore) straight away without headache and additional costly professional skills. In this spirit in my opinion TM architecture has a big defect because the TM HD is NOT bootable (and other &#039;minors&#039; not subject of this post) . 

*2)
As I don&#039;t think that TM architects didn&#039;t think about that (see *1)) I have to &#039;&#039;accept&#039;&#039; that TM is designed as IS. Means obviously marketing and other economic interests moved Apple to include a backup tool into Leopard which in other platforms would not be accepeted as to mean business &quot;backup&quot; systems. That&#039;s a pity and if you like or dis-like window-dressing. How to make an obvious reliable, fast and non-HD-costly and secure backup tool is NOT a secret or matter of science or technical enigma: it&#039;s a matter of or doing it or having other tendency. Point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice thoughts to get around of an apparently OR bad TM architecture *1) OR TM designed like that by purpose *2).</p>
<p>*1)<br />
A real-live backup of a production or &#8216;homemade&#8217; system only is of real-live use if you can be &#8216;back&#8217; (restore) straight away without headache and additional costly professional skills. In this spirit in my opinion TM architecture has a big defect because the TM HD is NOT bootable (and other &#8216;minors&#8217; not subject of this post) . </p>
<p>*2)<br />
As I don&#8217;t think that TM architects didn&#8217;t think about that (see *1)) I have to &#8221;accept&#8221; that TM is designed as IS. Means obviously marketing and other economic interests moved Apple to include a backup tool into Leopard which in other platforms would not be accepeted as to mean business &#8220;backup&#8221; systems. That&#8217;s a pity and if you like or dis-like window-dressing. How to make an obvious reliable, fast and non-HD-costly and secure backup tool is NOT a secret or matter of science or technical enigma: it&#8217;s a matter of or doing it or having other tendency. Point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doc</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13250/comment-page-1/#comment-437400</link>
		<dc:creator>Doc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:06:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13250#comment-437400</guid>
		<description>Yet another great tip Dan, keep up the good work!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another great tip Dan, keep up the good work!<br />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
