<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Apple Adobe Spat Continues.   Flash Available for iPhone, but Only in Lab</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13249/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13249/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:32:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13249/comment-page-1/#comment-559035</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13249#comment-559035</guid>
		<description>Apple should buy Adobe, that&#039;s for sure. And then Apple can make Apple CS4... With Apple Photoshop, Apple Flash, etc... Best of all, it would be Mac-only!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple should buy Adobe, that&#8217;s for sure. And then Apple can make Apple CS4&#8230; With Apple Photoshop, Apple Flash, etc&#8230; Best of all, it would be Mac-only!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13249/comment-page-1/#comment-437748</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13249#comment-437748</guid>
		<description>Actually I think that Apple should just get it over and they should buy Adobe. I mean can you see a better fit?  Plus Apple has a ton of cash they&#039;re sitting on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I think that Apple should just get it over and they should buy Adobe. I mean can you see a better fit?  Plus Apple has a ton of cash they&#8217;re sitting on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13249/comment-page-1/#comment-436363</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13249#comment-436363</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s weird to see the two companies &quot;bicker&quot; over Flash on the iPhone considering the relationship the two are building outside of the mobile arena. Adobe &lt;a href=&quot;http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo:developerfaq#Is_this_the_same_WebKit_project_that_the_Safari_browser_on_Mac_OS_X_and_the_KHTML_Browser_in_KDE_use.3F&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AIR  + Webkit&lt;/a&gt; anyone? Just get Flash on the handset!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s weird to see the two companies &quot;bicker&quot; over Flash on the iPhone considering the relationship the two are building outside of the mobile arena. Adobe <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Apollo:developerfaq#Is_this_the_same_WebKit_project_that_the_Safari_browser_on_Mac_OS_X_and_the_KHTML_Browser_in_KDE_use.3F" rel="nofollow">AIR  + Webkit</a> anyone? Just get Flash on the handset!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
