<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palm Rocks With Latest Report &#8211; Market Share Up To 13.4%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13216/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13216/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:28:02 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: grapeshot</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13216/comment-page-1/#comment-410854</link>
		<dc:creator>grapeshot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13216#comment-410854</guid>
		<description>I bought my Palm T&#124;X just a couple of years ago, after debating for a long time which platform to spend my hard earned $$ on.  What decided me was not only price (it cost less than the equivalent PocketPC), but that it had a mature operating system and oodles an oodles of applications that had been around for a long time.  To my mind that meant there weren&#039;t likely to be ugly surprises yet to be discovered with it.  It can do almost everything that a Blackberry or iPhone can except make phone calls.   This last thing doesn&#039;t bother me the least, since I prefer my phone to just be a phone.  I&#039;ve never regretted my purchase, and have never not once eyed up a Blackberry or an iPhone and considered dumping my Palm.  The Palm OS may not be very slick looking, but it functions perfectly for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought my Palm T|X just a couple of years ago, after debating for a long time which platform to spend my hard earned $$ on.  What decided me was not only price (it cost less than the equivalent PocketPC), but that it had a mature operating system and oodles an oodles of applications that had been around for a long time.  To my mind that meant there weren&#8217;t likely to be ugly surprises yet to be discovered with it.  It can do almost everything that a Blackberry or iPhone can except make phone calls.   This last thing doesn&#8217;t bother me the least, since I prefer my phone to just be a phone.  I&#8217;ve never regretted my purchase, and have never not once eyed up a Blackberry or an iPhone and considered dumping my Palm.  The Palm OS may not be very slick looking, but it functions perfectly for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G . H I S C O T T</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/06/13216/comment-page-1/#comment-410833</link>
		<dc:creator>G . H I S C O T T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 22:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13216#comment-410833</guid>
		<description>I love my Treo 680 and I had a palm pilot 5000 back in 96.
The instant on was fabulous.  The all features in one package was the ultimate goal and Palm did it first.

True that they lost a huge lead to Apple and Blackberry but this post is encouraging.  The mass market is not stupid after all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love my Treo 680 and I had a palm pilot 5000 back in 96.<br />
The instant on was fabulous.  The all features in one package was the ultimate goal and Palm did it first.</p>
<p>True that they lost a huge lead to Apple and Blackberry but this post is encouraging.  The mass market is not stupid after all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
