<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fire Up The Lawyers:  Company Makes Illegal Mac Clone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/04/13147/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/04/13147/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:38:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/04/13147/comment-page-1/#comment-405425</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 03:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13147#comment-405425</guid>
		<description>http://gizmodo.com/380488/psystar-exposed-looks-like-a-hoax</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/380488/psystar-exposed-looks-like-a-hoax" rel="nofollow">http://gizmodo.com/380488/psystar-exposed-looks-like-a-hoax</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/04/13147/comment-page-1/#comment-405353</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13147#comment-405353</guid>
		<description>Gary - My apologies :)  Yes, I know the company I was referring to isn&#039;t yours, but it either had a very similar name or the product itself was labeled the Xtreme Mac.  I remember it being announced around 1997 or so and promised to be a 1200mhz computer.  Basically, the company would buy a stock Apple computer, then using the motherboard add on a new processor and accessories, thus getting around the licensing requirement.  The case looked god-awful, something like an old microphone from the 1930s.  Anyway, sorry about the confusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary &#8211; My apologies :)  Yes, I know the company I was referring to isn&#8217;t yours, but it either had a very similar name or the product itself was labeled the Xtreme Mac.  I remember it being announced around 1997 or so and promised to be a 1200mhz computer.  Basically, the company would buy a stock Apple computer, then using the motherboard add on a new processor and accessories, thus getting around the licensing requirement.  The case looked god-awful, something like an old microphone from the 1930s.  Anyway, sorry about the confusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Bart</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/04/13147/comment-page-1/#comment-405341</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Bart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13147#comment-405341</guid>
		<description>Ian, I don&#039;t know what you think you are referring to in your comment about XtremeMac. Our company has never made or even debated making such a product offering. You must be remembering something from another company. Just setting the record straight. 

Gary Bart
CEO
XtremeMac</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian, I don&#8217;t know what you think you are referring to in your comment about XtremeMac. Our company has never made or even debated making such a product offering. You must be remembering something from another company. Just setting the record straight. </p>
<p>Gary Bart<br />
CEO<br />
XtremeMac</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YiQin</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/04/13147/comment-page-1/#comment-405340</link>
		<dc:creator>YiQin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13147#comment-405340</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that &quot;Nigel&quot; is a bit worried? if apple hardware/design is as good as you claim then they should have nothing to fear from Pystar or other companies using their OS. The computer can&#039;t be called a Mac or any other of the trademarked names. This could ruin Apple&#039;s ----- business plan but would potentially give them more market share. 

Oh no, would it be possible that some company could make better hardware than apple? Its my understanding -feel free to correct me- that other companies already make most of the hardware for Apple&#039;s products, I&#039;m sure some of them would love to do so out of contract and sell the products themselves. That would cut Apple&#039;s protits.

I wish Pystar luck with their legal battle....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that &#8220;Nigel&#8221; is a bit worried? if apple hardware/design is as good as you claim then they should have nothing to fear from Pystar or other companies using their OS. The computer can&#8217;t be called a Mac or any other of the trademarked names. This could ruin Apple&#8217;s &#8212;&#8211; business plan but would potentially give them more market share. </p>
<p>Oh no, would it be possible that some company could make better hardware than apple? Its my understanding -feel free to correct me- that other companies already make most of the hardware for Apple&#8217;s products, I&#8217;m sure some of them would love to do so out of contract and sell the products themselves. That would cut Apple&#8217;s protits.</p>
<p>I wish Pystar luck with their legal battle&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/04/13147/comment-page-1/#comment-405331</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 03:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13147#comment-405331</guid>
		<description>&quot;Robert&quot; from Pystar, is taking it to court and comparing it to: &quot;What if Honda said that, after you buy their car, you could only drive it on the roads they said you could?&quot;

The idiot said &quot;after you buy their car&quot;, so the &#039;driver&#039; should have been aware of it.

i.e. he should have been aware of the Mac OS X EULA before he tried selling this and stirring trouble.

And every Apple product has that &quot;Mac&quot; is a trademark of Apple, Inc., whether he loopholed it by calling the computer OpenMac, but I don&#039;t blame Apple for being pissy.

They make &#039;sexy&#039; and &#039;quality&#039; products, to have a $399 computer come out could potentially ruin the Mac reputation (apart from smugness), can you blame them for wanting to get rid of this?

BTW: I am a Mac user, and relatively smug about it, so I can say that based on me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Robert&#8221; from Pystar, is taking it to court and comparing it to: &#8220;What if Honda said that, after you buy their car, you could only drive it on the roads they said you could?&#8221;</p>
<p>The idiot said &#8220;after you buy their car&#8221;, so the &#8216;driver&#8217; should have been aware of it.</p>
<p>i.e. he should have been aware of the Mac OS X EULA before he tried selling this and stirring trouble.</p>
<p>And every Apple product has that &#8220;Mac&#8221; is a trademark of Apple, Inc., whether he loopholed it by calling the computer OpenMac, but I don&#8217;t blame Apple for being pissy.</p>
<p>They make &#8217;sexy&#8217; and &#8216;quality&#8217; products, to have a $399 computer come out could potentially ruin the Mac reputation (apart from smugness), can you blame them for wanting to get rid of this?</p>
<p>BTW: I am a Mac user, and relatively smug about it, so I can say that based on me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/04/13147/comment-page-1/#comment-405320</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13147#comment-405320</guid>
		<description>the website isn&#039;t down anymore, i don&#039;t know why all the news sites are saying it &quot;disappeared&quot;... it probably just went down from a huge traffic hit. anyways, it&#039;s up now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the website isn&#8217;t down anymore, i don&#8217;t know why all the news sites are saying it &#8220;disappeared&#8221;&#8230; it probably just went down from a huge traffic hit. anyways, it&#8217;s up now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Meyer</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/04/13147/comment-page-1/#comment-405319</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13147#comment-405319</guid>
		<description>Why does this headline say &quot;Illegal Mac Clone?&quot;  Has this issue been settled in some court I&#039;m not aware of?  Is &quot;Dan&quot; a judge or even an attorney?  This just in:  &quot;Blogger jumps to conclusion and (allegedly) posts Illegal headline.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does this headline say &#8220;Illegal Mac Clone?&#8221;  Has this issue been settled in some court I&#8217;m not aware of?  Is &#8220;Dan&#8221; a judge or even an attorney?  This just in:  &#8220;Blogger jumps to conclusion and (allegedly) posts Illegal headline.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/04/13147/comment-page-1/#comment-405317</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13147#comment-405317</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that the only significant legal issue is the preinstallation of Leopard.  If they just sell the computer without an OS, it&#039;s just a collection of parts, and it leaves the user to break the EULA.  I guess the name OpenMac is also fuzzy, seeing as Apple goes after anything remotely resembling their trademarks.

I wonder too if they could just buy and resell Apple logic boards with a case and parts.  I remember XtremeMac trying to do that many years ago (never actually shipped though, if I remember correctly)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that the only significant legal issue is the preinstallation of Leopard.  If they just sell the computer without an OS, it&#8217;s just a collection of parts, and it leaves the user to break the EULA.  I guess the name OpenMac is also fuzzy, seeing as Apple goes after anything remotely resembling their trademarks.</p>
<p>I wonder too if they could just buy and resell Apple logic boards with a case and parts.  I remember XtremeMac trying to do that many years ago (never actually shipped though, if I remember correctly)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaredmellentine</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/04/13147/comment-page-1/#comment-405316</link>
		<dc:creator>jaredmellentine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13147#comment-405316</guid>
		<description>You can get the rest of the cached pages here: http://www.google.com/search?q=+site%3Awww.psystar.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can get the rest of the cached pages here: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=+site%3Awww.psystar.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?q=+site%3Awww.psystar.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaredmellentine</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2008/04/13147/comment-page-1/#comment-405315</link>
		<dc:creator>jaredmellentine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/?p=13147#comment-405315</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the Google cache: http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:8-nCAPGr2SYJ:www.psystar.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the Google cache: <a href="http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:8-nCAPGr2SYJ:www.psystar.com/" rel="nofollow">http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:8-nCAPGr2SYJ:www.psystar.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
