Comments on: Blog Judge Passes Uneasy

By: Judge

Judge — Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:34:04 +0000

Hello there and thanks for the response Uneasy.

I’m actually here to reply on RICH’s comment.

The site displays far too may tags – rendering the tag cloud useless.

As far as I know (I’m not claiming to be an expert), Google and other search engines crawl those tags, and more pages on Google = more chances of someone finding my blog.

The guy doesn’t. Write complete sentences (the site is littered with Fragments).

I still have trouble with spending time writing, so I sometimes write fast short stuff.

Finally, the design is awful.

I’ll see what I can do about that, in time.

Original Content: 10
Popularity: 4
Design: 3
Banners: 10
Age: 1
Information: 7

So I guess The Blog Judge is GUILTY.

Well, according to your review, it’s actually NOT GUILTY.
I decide that a blog is guilty when it can’t pass the 5.0 mark.
10+10+8+4+3+1 divided by 6 is above the 5.0 mark, so it’s NOT GUILTY.

Thanks for the review.

By: Ian

Ian — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:10:28 +0000

Strangely, I feel like his own site wouldn’t fare too well through his scoring system.

By: Rich

Rich — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:11:09 +0000

The Blog Judge is a great idea; however, I would like to share my verdict.

The Blog Judge is awful for the following reasons: The site displays far too may tags – rendering the tag cloud useless. The guy doesn’t. Write complete sentences (the site is littered with Fragments). Finally, the design is awful.

Original Content: 10
Popularity: 4
Design: 3
Banners: 10
Age: 1
Information: 7

So I guess The Blog Judge is GUILTY.