<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MacFuse alternative for FULL read / write of NTFS drives</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12659/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12659/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:32:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bopmachine</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12659/comment-page-1/#comment-399535</link>
		<dc:creator>bopmachine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12659/#comment-399535</guid>
		<description>Just wanna chime in and say I bought Paragon NTFS on this post&#039;s recommendation and can&#039;t be more happy. For all intents and purposes all my NTFS partitions act native in OSX. Great recommendation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanna chime in and say I bought Paragon NTFS on this post&#8217;s recommendation and can&#8217;t be more happy. For all intents and purposes all my NTFS partitions act native in OSX. Great recommendation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12659/comment-page-1/#comment-399446</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12659/#comment-399446</guid>
		<description>My results were
Paragon NTFS:  20 MB/sec
NTFS-3G with UBLIO cache disabled:  1 MB/sec
NTFS-3G with UBLIO cache enabled: 20 MB/sec

For the latter I used http://macntfs-3g.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My results were<br />
Paragon NTFS:  20 MB/sec<br />
NTFS-3G with UBLIO cache disabled:  1 MB/sec<br />
NTFS-3G with UBLIO cache enabled: 20 MB/sec</p>
<p>For the latter I used <a href="http://macntfs-3g.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://macntfs-3g.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12659/comment-page-1/#comment-399416</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 05:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12659/#comment-399416</guid>
		<description>Oh, my question is how fast is Paragon compared to NTFS-3G. I know the  Paragon  website have this big benchmark chart. But what I want to know is real world test of writing to a NTFS drive. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, my question is how fast is Paragon compared to NTFS-3G. I know the  Paragon  website have this big benchmark chart. But what I want to know is real world test of writing to a NTFS drive. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12659/comment-page-1/#comment-399399</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 22:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12659/#comment-399399</guid>
		<description>i did last week.   used the unstable build and got 20BM/sec transfers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i did last week.   used the unstable build and got 20BM/sec transfers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12659/comment-page-1/#comment-399380</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12659/#comment-399380</guid>
		<description>Did you use MacFuse manually with the Console? Have you tried NTFS-3G for OSX? It&#039;s a simple GUI installation process and the latest version works with Leopard. 

Link: http://macntfs-3g.blogspot.com/

Also, if you have problems with it, just leave a comment and the developer will help you out. He&#039;s a really nice guy and very responsive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you use MacFuse manually with the Console? Have you tried NTFS-3G for OSX? It&#8217;s a simple GUI installation process and the latest version works with Leopard. </p>
<p>Link: <a href="http://macntfs-3g.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://macntfs-3g.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Also, if you have problems with it, just leave a comment and the developer will help you out. He&#8217;s a really nice guy and very responsive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12659/comment-page-1/#comment-399376</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12659/#comment-399376</guid>
		<description>Nice, any comments on how well Paragon NTFS is working?

Edward</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, any comments on how well Paragon NTFS is working?</p>
<p>Edward</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
