FCC To Set Your Building Free: Apartment Building Can No Longer Sign Exclusive Deals with Cable Co’s
Tired of having only one cable company service your building? Odds are that your building signed an exclusive agreement with the provider you are locked too, but thanks to the FCC and Kevin “Ă la carte” Martin those agreements may now be illegal.
The new rule would shift the bargaining power over cable and broadband services to apartment residents from landlords and tenant associations. It has been long sought by consumer groups as part of a broader effort to cut prices to the roughly 100 million households that pay for access to television.
The change would be an abrupt reversal for the commission, which only four years ago ruled that such exclusive agreements sometimes actually promoted competition by giving landlords the leverage to negotiate for the best terms.
Commission officials said they had prohibited other exclusive contracts involving telecommunications, including those in commercial buildings, but trade groups representing cable companies and building owners have indicated they may challenge the commission’s move in court.
Commission officials said the rule aims to put an end to some common practices of landlords and tenant associations that have deprived tenants of choices. They said that in many communities, there has been only one cable provider, and while landlords and tenant associations could select a satellite television provider, the competition from those companies has not led to lower cable prices.
Will it really lower prices? I’m not so sure but I’m sure it will make richer landlords. What do you thing of your buildings Cable company of choice?

3 Comments, Comment or Trackback
Ian Adams
‘Took them long enough! My last apartment had an exclusive contract with Millenium Cable, which was always going down and just generally having shitty service with an increased cost. Now I’m living in an apartment where the ONLY ISP I could get was another exclusive contract with Ygnition (probably the worst ISP in the world). I couldn’t even get DSL into my apartment, so I’m stuck with them.
So regardless of whether or not it lowers prices, just having the option to dump shitty ISPs will be worth its weight in gold.
Oct 29th, 2007
Mike D
Great so now cable and internet being included with a building is going out the door. What a freakin asshat
Oct 29th, 2007
Billy Halsey
Personally, I’m tired of being forced into AT&T Home Entertainment. What that means for me is DSL or nothin’. I don’t have the choice to get cable at all because my apartment community has an exclusive deal with the satellite provider (AT&T). I pay more for 6Mbps DSL than my friends in another community across town with 12MBps cable modem. Why? Because I don’t have a choice in providers at this location.
Oct 29th, 2007
Reply to “FCC To Set Your Building Free: Apartment Building Can No Longer Sign Exclusive Deals with Cable Co’s”