<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Say&#8217;s Tough Luck With Your Unlocked iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/09/12324/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/09/12324/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:18:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: philipo</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/09/12324/comment-page-1/#comment-397860</link>
		<dc:creator>philipo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/09/12324/#comment-397860</guid>
		<description>yeah websnap,

your totally right enough it&#039;s right they are punishing people for actually finding faults in the system,

JUUUUUUST like they did when the Ipod said &quot;don&#039;t steal music&quot; on a screen sticker. Funny how apple didn&#039;t issue statements saying stay away from ipodrip or you ipod will break!!  You know why? cos they knew things like ipodrip would make the contents of the ipod even more available.... it&#039;s the same with the iphone you fool....... stick out a statement saying don&#039;t unlock the thing but then realise all those people who didnt wanna switch from sprint/verizon etc,,,, all these guys can al of a sudden be seen on the street with an iphone, = friends asking about unlocked versions on ebay/chinatown etc etc etc etc need I say more? do you see where this is going???

i&#039;ll tell you. apple being happy that people are hacking the crap out of their phones because it will subsequently  mean more sales and at&amp;t getting pissed off cos half the people with iphones have them unlocked on t-mobile......THEN  apple release weekly updates in order to constantly remove unlocking codes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah websnap,</p>
<p>your totally right enough it&#8217;s right they are punishing people for actually finding faults in the system,</p>
<p>JUUUUUUST like they did when the Ipod said &#8220;don&#8217;t steal music&#8221; on a screen sticker. Funny how apple didn&#8217;t issue statements saying stay away from ipodrip or you ipod will break!!  You know why? cos they knew things like ipodrip would make the contents of the ipod even more available&#8230;. it&#8217;s the same with the iphone you fool&#8230;&#8230;. stick out a statement saying don&#8217;t unlock the thing but then realise all those people who didnt wanna switch from sprint/verizon etc,,,, all these guys can al of a sudden be seen on the street with an iphone, = friends asking about unlocked versions on ebay/chinatown etc etc etc etc need I say more? do you see where this is going???</p>
<p>i&#8217;ll tell you. apple being happy that people are hacking the crap out of their phones because it will subsequently  mean more sales and at&amp;t getting pissed off cos half the people with iphones have them unlocked on t-mobile&#8230;&#8230;THEN  apple release weekly updates in order to constantly remove unlocking codes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hatejeff</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/09/12324/comment-page-1/#comment-397467</link>
		<dc:creator>Hatejeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:23:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/09/12324/#comment-397467</guid>
		<description>No Apple has a responsibility to the customer, that is there biggest responsibility... It is perfectly legal to unlock any cell phone in the U.S Its dumb that apple are trying to take care of its partner at the expense of  its customer.... Why apple? Why must you go along with the cellular sheep. Think out of the box  release a phone that can be used on all networks.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Apple has a responsibility to the customer, that is there biggest responsibility&#8230; It is perfectly legal to unlock any cell phone in the U.S Its dumb that apple are trying to take care of its partner at the expense of  its customer&#8230;. Why apple? Why must you go along with the cellular sheep. Think out of the box  release a phone that can be used on all networks&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: websnap</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/09/12324/comment-page-1/#comment-397458</link>
		<dc:creator>websnap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/09/12324/#comment-397458</guid>
		<description>Why wouldn&#039;t you warranty be voided? If you hack your phone then you have participated in uses not supported by apple. If the update causes the hack to render your phone a brick after it&#039;s installation, who&#039;s fault is that? It&#039;s not that they won&#039;t fix it, just not for free. Makes sense to me since everyone who installed the hack knew the consequences. 

I can&#039;t put a chip into my Nintendo Wii then complain that I can&#039;t install a software update. I would have purposely voided the warranty. All the legal information with the phone (as well as most of the info that comes with the hacks) says you are in fact voiding the warranty. It&#039;s not Apple&#039;s fault. They can&#039;t just &quot;adjust&quot; for any of the various hack that could be in the wild just so users can remain under warranty. They have a responsibility to at least &quot;appear&quot; to honor AT&amp;T&#039;s agreement, and working to protect the hacks wouldn&#039;t really be conducive to that. If_ and that is only if_ the update breaks it there is only the user to blame. 

In all honesty thought, I think there is probably a good chance it won&#039;t break it, it&#039;s more of a save face to AT&amp;T.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why wouldn&#8217;t you warranty be voided? If you hack your phone then you have participated in uses not supported by apple. If the update causes the hack to render your phone a brick after it&#8217;s installation, who&#8217;s fault is that? It&#8217;s not that they won&#8217;t fix it, just not for free. Makes sense to me since everyone who installed the hack knew the consequences. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t put a chip into my Nintendo Wii then complain that I can&#8217;t install a software update. I would have purposely voided the warranty. All the legal information with the phone (as well as most of the info that comes with the hacks) says you are in fact voiding the warranty. It&#8217;s not Apple&#8217;s fault. They can&#8217;t just &#8220;adjust&#8221; for any of the various hack that could be in the wild just so users can remain under warranty. They have a responsibility to at least &#8220;appear&#8221; to honor AT&amp;T&#8217;s agreement, and working to protect the hacks wouldn&#8217;t really be conducive to that. If_ and that is only if_ the update breaks it there is only the user to blame. </p>
<p>In all honesty thought, I think there is probably a good chance it won&#8217;t break it, it&#8217;s more of a save face to AT&amp;T.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/09/12324/comment-page-1/#comment-397457</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/09/12324/#comment-397457</guid>
		<description>The way i read it, it they are merely voiding the iPhone&#039;s software warranty (aka your phone support assistance for bundled products).  Apple have always reserved the right to not provide service if they believe you were misusing their product.

Apple also have a responsibility to A) Their Carriers, B) Their Music Labels and C) Their Shareholders.

The point really is, If your phone is currently hacked, then don&#039;t upgrade, or revert it to factory standard before upgrading.

I don&#039;t see why so many people are complaining- It&#039;s one of the first phones that&#039;s really -properly- been hackable in the first place, what&#039;s to say someone wont find a new exploit after the next update. It&#039;s also not like other companies don&#039;t do this to you as well- Sony, Nintendo etc will void warranties and refuse service if you&#039;re not using the recommended firmware on their handheld devices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way i read it, it they are merely voiding the iPhone&#8217;s software warranty (aka your phone support assistance for bundled products).  Apple have always reserved the right to not provide service if they believe you were misusing their product.</p>
<p>Apple also have a responsibility to A) Their Carriers, B) Their Music Labels and C) Their Shareholders.</p>
<p>The point really is, If your phone is currently hacked, then don&#8217;t upgrade, or revert it to factory standard before upgrading.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see why so many people are complaining- It&#8217;s one of the first phones that&#8217;s really -properly- been hackable in the first place, what&#8217;s to say someone wont find a new exploit after the next update. It&#8217;s also not like other companies don&#8217;t do this to you as well- Sony, Nintendo etc will void warranties and refuse service if you&#8217;re not using the recommended firmware on their handheld devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
