<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Universal Continues iTunes War Cry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/12075/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/12075/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:32:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mudkip</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/12075/comment-page-1/#comment-396334</link>
		<dc:creator>Mudkip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 20:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/12075/#comment-396334</guid>
		<description>LOL what? Pay for what is broadcast over the air for free?

Are these people insane?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL what? Pay for what is broadcast over the air for free?</p>
<p>Are these people insane?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WEBSNAP</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/12075/comment-page-1/#comment-396162</link>
		<dc:creator>WEBSNAP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 03:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/12075/#comment-396162</guid>
		<description>@ annon

How you pay your cable bill is irrelevant unless you are talking about a download subscription model. Just because you pay a cable bill doesn&#039;t entitle you (or anyone else) the opportunity the watch television at you convenience away from your TV without paying for that convenience. If that was the case then the Cable company would need to get a cut for all the viewers it would be loosing due to downloads, which would still put the cost-per-episode at a higher rate that it is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ annon</p>
<p>How you pay your cable bill is irrelevant unless you are talking about a download subscription model. Just because you pay a cable bill doesn&#8217;t entitle you (or anyone else) the opportunity the watch television at you convenience away from your TV without paying for that convenience. If that was the case then the Cable company would need to get a cut for all the viewers it would be loosing due to downloads, which would still put the cost-per-episode at a higher rate that it is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: annon</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/12075/comment-page-1/#comment-396145</link>
		<dc:creator>annon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/12075/#comment-396145</guid>
		<description>A half hour and an full hour doesn&#039;t matter, you don&#039;t pay you cable bill per show you watch,  and lets hope it never gets that far. You just pay to have access to anything you want and watch it for how ever long you want it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A half hour and an full hour doesn&#8217;t matter, you don&#8217;t pay you cable bill per show you watch,  and lets hope it never gets that far. You just pay to have access to anything you want and watch it for how ever long you want it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Adams</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/12075/comment-page-1/#comment-396137</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 18:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/12075/#comment-396137</guid>
		<description>Well, for some TV shows, DVD sales are much more than a &quot;tip&quot;. HBO, for example, makes no money on advertising because they don&#039;t have advertising during their shows. Obviously NBC Universal isn&#039;t in that situation with most of their network TV shows, but it&#039;s becoming increasingly more difficult to make money on a show through advertising alone, and are looking towards new revenue lines like iTunes. And given that iTunes dominates the market of online content distribution, spiting Apple like that is just as good as shooting yourself in a main artery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, for some TV shows, DVD sales are much more than a &#8220;tip&#8221;. HBO, for example, makes no money on advertising because they don&#8217;t have advertising during their shows. Obviously NBC Universal isn&#8217;t in that situation with most of their network TV shows, but it&#8217;s becoming increasingly more difficult to make money on a show through advertising alone, and are looking towards new revenue lines like iTunes. And given that iTunes dominates the market of online content distribution, spiting Apple like that is just as good as shooting yourself in a main artery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: websnap</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/12075/comment-page-1/#comment-396126</link>
		<dc:creator>websnap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/12075/#comment-396126</guid>
		<description>I can see the point of having a price for &quot;Heroes&quot; and a different price for &quot;The Office&quot; due to their difference in length but I think that about all network shows. AN hour long show is usually more expensive to produce so I wouldn&#039;t say raising it above the cost of a half hour program isn&#039;t exactly and artificial inflation. If the just want to charge more for Programs because the are popular - regardless of their length - that would just be NBC being greedy and I&#039;ll be siding apple on this. 

I the long run, what&#039;s the point? This isn&#039;t a required revenue stream, it&#039;s more like a bonus or tip like DVD sales – above and beyond tv advertising sales. Take the extra money you weren&#039;t counting on and be thankfull. You not going to make as much money or sales as you did with iTunes anywhere else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the point of having a price for &#8220;Heroes&#8221; and a different price for &#8220;The Office&#8221; due to their difference in length but I think that about all network shows. AN hour long show is usually more expensive to produce so I wouldn&#8217;t say raising it above the cost of a half hour program isn&#8217;t exactly and artificial inflation. If the just want to charge more for Programs because the are popular &#8211; regardless of their length &#8211; that would just be NBC being greedy and I&#8217;ll be siding apple on this. </p>
<p>I the long run, what&#8217;s the point? This isn&#8217;t a required revenue stream, it&#8217;s more like a bonus or tip like DVD sales – above and beyond tv advertising sales. Take the extra money you weren&#8217;t counting on and be thankfull. You not going to make as much money or sales as you did with iTunes anywhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
