<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google, Fresh Out Of the Video Business Sorta Enters Music Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/11814/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/11814/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:27:42 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim Smith</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/11814/comment-page-1/#comment-395088</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/08/11814/#comment-395088</guid>
		<description>Seems like a no-brainer on Googles part.  If they can leverage their existing adsense and adwords infrastructure to subsidize DRM free music, and Universal makes a killing selling DRM-free music, then I think Google has a real chance to seriously injure Apple and iTunes.  

I see it this way...using adwords and adsense advertising, plus taking a really small taste of each track sold, the service pays for itself, with perhaps a small profit for Google.  Google then maximizes the profit that Universal makes by giving a large majority of per track revenue to them.

Smart play here on Google&#039;s part.  The future, whether the labels admit it or not, is in DRM-free music.  As users become more knowledgeable, they will start demanding it.  Google is offering a (quasi)free distribution system to the labels, and proving they can maximize profits for them.  Once the other labels see it working, I think Google&#039;s feeling are that the others will follow.

Look to see Apple&#039;s response....I&#039;m not sure they can respond, as they don&#039;t have the advertising infrastructure Google has.  

Interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like a no-brainer on Googles part.  If they can leverage their existing adsense and adwords infrastructure to subsidize DRM free music, and Universal makes a killing selling DRM-free music, then I think Google has a real chance to seriously injure Apple and iTunes.  </p>
<p>I see it this way&#8230;using adwords and adsense advertising, plus taking a really small taste of each track sold, the service pays for itself, with perhaps a small profit for Google.  Google then maximizes the profit that Universal makes by giving a large majority of per track revenue to them.</p>
<p>Smart play here on Google&#8217;s part.  The future, whether the labels admit it or not, is in DRM-free music.  As users become more knowledgeable, they will start demanding it.  Google is offering a (quasi)free distribution system to the labels, and proving they can maximize profits for them.  Once the other labels see it working, I think Google&#8217;s feeling are that the others will follow.</p>
<p>Look to see Apple&#8217;s response&#8230;.I&#8217;m not sure they can respond, as they don&#8217;t have the advertising infrastructure Google has.  </p>
<p>Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
