Comments on: Quick and Easy GMail Encryption With FireFox http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/07/11357/ Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:40:00 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: BovineOne http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/07/11357/comment-page-1/#comment-392946 BovineOne Mon, 09 Jul 2007 22:44:31 +0000 http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/07/11357/#comment-392946 Please don't go around inventing a new message encryption format. Use either the PGP standard (RFC 1991 and RFC 2440) or the X.509 message standard. Encrypted e-mail adoption is difficult enough without the need to further complicate things with more incompatible formats. Please don’t go around inventing a new message encryption format. Use either the PGP standard (RFC 1991 and RFC 2440) or the X.509 message standard. Encrypted e-mail adoption is difficult enough without the need to further complicate things with more incompatible formats.

]]> By: Don Wilson http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/07/11357/comment-page-1/#comment-392583 Don Wilson Fri, 06 Jul 2007 02:31:45 +0000 http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/07/11357/#comment-392583 Too much work for me. Too much work for me.

]]> By: Joe Anderson http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/07/11357/comment-page-1/#comment-392553 Joe Anderson Thu, 05 Jul 2007 20:22:20 +0000 http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/07/11357/#comment-392553 Doesn't compare with GPG, though, does it? If you have GPG btw Dan email me your fingerprint! Doesn’t compare with GPG, though, does it?

If you have GPG btw Dan email me your fingerprint!

]]>