<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Save Last.fm Music Streams</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/06/11308/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/06/11308/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:32:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: free wii</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/06/11308/comment-page-1/#comment-656199</link>
		<dc:creator>free wii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 22:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/06/11308/#comment-656199</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t understand why google would need to do that. really, is there any point? I have read elsewhere that it still passes PR juice around? Anybody have an answer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t understand why google would need to do that. really, is there any point? I have read elsewhere that it still passes PR juice around? Anybody have an answer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
