<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Palm OS &quot;light&quot; dies, no one cares?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:25:52 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/comment-page-1/#comment-395406</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/#comment-395406</guid>
		<description>I fell in love with the whole Palm OS back with my first IIIe, and I migrated through various Palm devices (IIIxe, IIIc, M505) until I got my current (and totally indispensable) Treo 650 with the Garnet OS. I absolutely love the simple system - it does exactly what I need it to do and tons more. 

More than that, the Palm Desktop is without question the finest, most functional desktop organizing system (far better than any incarnation of Outlook) - and it&#039;s free, and (importantly) Non-Microsoft. 

I&#039;ve tried Windows OS, and all I can say is that it&#039;s a shame that the Palm OS is toast. I, for one, care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fell in love with the whole Palm OS back with my first IIIe, and I migrated through various Palm devices (IIIxe, IIIc, M505) until I got my current (and totally indispensable) Treo 650 with the Garnet OS. I absolutely love the simple system &#8211; it does exactly what I need it to do and tons more. </p>
<p>More than that, the Palm Desktop is without question the finest, most functional desktop organizing system (far better than any incarnation of Outlook) &#8211; and it&#8217;s free, and (importantly) Non-Microsoft. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried Windows OS, and all I can say is that it&#8217;s a shame that the Palm OS is toast. I, for one, care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/comment-page-1/#comment-389563</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 18:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/#comment-389563</guid>
		<description>I started with a Handspring, moved tp a Treo 650,  then a Treo 750.  I did like the Palm OS, but the Windows OS,  after you get used to it,  is far batter,  more customizable and can acomplish more and faster.  My 650 wasn&#039;t that stable either.  I can&#039;t wait for WM 6.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started with a Handspring, moved tp a Treo 650,  then a Treo 750.  I did like the Palm OS, but the Windows OS,  after you get used to it,  is far batter,  more customizable and can acomplish more and faster.  My 650 wasn&#8217;t that stable either.  I can&#8217;t wait for WM 6.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/comment-page-1/#comment-389628</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 17:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/#comment-389628</guid>
		<description>I HOPE the iPhone is a complete failure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HOPE the iPhone is a complete failure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/comment-page-1/#comment-389617</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 15:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/#comment-389617</guid>
		<description>Windows Mobile the future majority stakeholder?  I doubt it.  Symbian is already on millions more handhelds than Windows Mobile and is being adopted at more than healthy rates, not to mention a variety of hacked down linux/unix kernels that are the core of many phones.  I would be willing to bet that in five years, Windows Mobile will find itself in 4th place behind custom unix implimentations, symbian, and the forthcoming Apple mobile platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows Mobile the future majority stakeholder?  I doubt it.  Symbian is already on millions more handhelds than Windows Mobile and is being adopted at more than healthy rates, not to mention a variety of hacked down linux/unix kernels that are the core of many phones.  I would be willing to bet that in five years, Windows Mobile will find itself in 4th place behind custom unix implimentations, symbian, and the forthcoming Apple mobile platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/comment-page-1/#comment-389613</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 14:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/#comment-389613</guid>
		<description>I had an aging b&amp;w handspring visor deluxe until last year, I loved it for its ease to use, now I own an HTC Wizard (T-Mobile MDA) and I got to say the calendar sucks, what where they thinking? I tried some other calendars with no luck, they are bloated and annoying to use. The OS experience in general is quite lame :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had an aging b&amp;w handspring visor deluxe until last year, I loved it for its ease to use, now I own an HTC Wizard (T-Mobile MDA) and I got to say the calendar sucks, what where they thinking? I tried some other calendars with no luck, they are bloated and annoying to use. The OS experience in general is quite lame :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/comment-page-1/#comment-389585</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 08:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/#comment-389585</guid>
		<description>Like Billy, I started out with a Handspring Visor, then moved to a non-phone-based Treo (yes, they did make those), then to a Dell Axim, and now I&#039;ve finally settled on what I view to be the best mobile OS right now, the BlackBerry.  Sure, the iPhone is less than a month away, but I&#039;ve been incredibly impressed with the Pearl that I might just pick up the new Curve when it comes out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Billy, I started out with a Handspring Visor, then moved to a non-phone-based Treo (yes, they did make those), then to a Dell Axim, and now I&#8217;ve finally settled on what I view to be the best mobile OS right now, the BlackBerry.  Sure, the iPhone is less than a month away, but I&#8217;ve been incredibly impressed with the Pearl that I might just pick up the new Curve when it comes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/comment-page-1/#comment-389571</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 04:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/#comment-389571</guid>
		<description>The whole idea of Palm OS (and PDAs in general) is not to have a computer at your fingertips, but an easy to-do list, address book, and memo pad at your disposal. They even did tests when Palms first came out; it was far faster and took less clicks to use one hand and find a phone number. As PDAs became more complex, they lost that fundamental goal and became, essentially, small general-use computers.

I&#039;d take my aging monochrome Palm Vx over a new Pocket PC machine any day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole idea of Palm OS (and PDAs in general) is not to have a computer at your fingertips, but an easy to-do list, address book, and memo pad at your disposal. They even did tests when Palms first came out; it was far faster and took less clicks to use one hand and find a phone number. As PDAs became more complex, they lost that fundamental goal and became, essentially, small general-use computers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d take my aging monochrome Palm Vx over a new Pocket PC machine any day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kendrick</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/comment-page-1/#comment-389565</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 03:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/#comment-389565</guid>
		<description>man i used windows mobile for lotsa years, then last year went to a treo 700p because windows mobile was so quirky.  Now I&#039;m very frustrated by the pains i&#039;m having with Palm os, it is just a deal breaker to not be able to multitask programs. I don&#039;t either one, but right now, if i had to choose, i would go with a windows unit. anyone want to buy my 700p?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man i used windows mobile for lotsa years, then last year went to a treo 700p because windows mobile was so quirky.  Now I&#8217;m very frustrated by the pains i&#8217;m having with Palm os, it is just a deal breaker to not be able to multitask programs. I don&#8217;t either one, but right now, if i had to choose, i would go with a windows unit. anyone want to buy my 700p?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chad</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/comment-page-1/#comment-389559</link>
		<dc:creator>chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 02:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/#comment-389559</guid>
		<description>I too recently made the jump to Palm OS... after a frustrating 9 months of WIndows Mobile 5 I ditched the 700w and went to a 680p... so far, I like Palm better, but I think both OS&#039;s could be improved greatly.

the leanest meanest and most efficient OS I have seen on a full qwerty keyboarded phone so far (although locked down and expandability sucks) the sidekick II and sidekick III&#039;s OS is great.  It&#039;s fast, fairly efficient, well supported, and the apps you can use are usually top notch.  Plus over the air updates and outlook syncing with a little piece of software... 

I just wish they would open up the platform for developers :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too recently made the jump to Palm OS&#8230; after a frustrating 9 months of WIndows Mobile 5 I ditched the 700w and went to a 680p&#8230; so far, I like Palm better, but I think both OS&#8217;s could be improved greatly.</p>
<p>the leanest meanest and most efficient OS I have seen on a full qwerty keyboarded phone so far (although locked down and expandability sucks) the sidekick II and sidekick III&#8217;s OS is great.  It&#8217;s fast, fairly efficient, well supported, and the apps you can use are usually top notch.  Plus over the air updates and outlook syncing with a little piece of software&#8230; </p>
<p>I just wish they would open up the platform for developers :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/comment-page-1/#comment-389556</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 00:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/05/10862/#comment-389556</guid>
		<description>Windows mobile is just frustrating to use, the OS gets in the way of operation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Windows mobile is just frustrating to use, the OS gets in the way of operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
