Comments on: (Apple)TV Good To Go! http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9921/ Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:53:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Andre http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9921/comment-page-1/#comment-380903 Andre Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:01:13 +0000 http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9921/#comment-380903 Why is the processor under-clocked to almost 33% of it's main power? o-0 Why is the processor under-clocked to almost 33% of it’s main power? o-0

]]> By: BroncoBash http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9921/comment-page-1/#comment-380873 BroncoBash Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:12:12 +0000 http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9921/#comment-380873 Yeah cause it's not like Apple would make you OVER pay for hardware specs right? --Apple hardware pricing slammed again..do you accept? *Vista Security* Yeah cause it’s not like Apple would make you OVER pay for hardware specs right?

–Apple hardware pricing slammed again..do you accept? *Vista Security*

]]> By: Cynic821 http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9921/comment-page-1/#comment-380867 Cynic821 Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:01:52 +0000 http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9921/#comment-380867 ill be streaming 90% of my content if not more from a USB drive connected to an 802.11n Airport Extreme and i would think most would stream anyways so HDD size isnt all that big of a concern. even DVCPro HD is 100mb per second, 256mb of ram seems like more than enough when combined with the video processor for displaying HD video. Especially considering next gen video game systems have like 512 mb of ram. ill be streaming 90% of my content if not more from a USB drive connected to an 802.11n Airport Extreme and i would think most would stream anyways so HDD size isnt all that big of a concern. even DVCPro HD is 100mb per second, 256mb of ram seems like more than enough when combined with the video processor for displaying HD video. Especially considering next gen video game systems have like 512 mb of ram.

]]> By: Ravi http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9921/comment-page-1/#comment-380865 Ravi Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:29:51 +0000 http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9921/#comment-380865 so why is the memory limited to 256mb??? wouldnt larger files require higher memory? 40GB HD? isnt that too small in todays world? PATA? why is everything sooo limited? GRR so why is the memory limited to 256mb??? wouldnt larger files require higher memory?
40GB HD? isnt that too small in todays world? PATA?

why is everything sooo limited? GRR

]]>