http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9812/ Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:28:06 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9812/comment-page-1/#comment-394086 Joshua Fri, 27 Jul 2007 01:58:28 +0000 http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9812/#comment-394086 can u try to make VMware fusion work on a pc cause i have ubuntu lunux and i would like to run beryl on it and in the normal VMware workstaion it does not work when i click beryl manger the virtual PC would restart so im trying to get on google , live and other seach engines and i really like linux but i have windows vista ultimate with NIVDIA 6150 and i really want to try it so........... does beryl work on it? can u try to make VMware fusion work on a pc cause i have ubuntu lunux and i would like to run beryl on it and in the normal VMware workstaion it does not work when i click beryl manger the virtual PC would restart so im trying to get on google , live and other seach engines and i really like linux but i have windows vista ultimate with NIVDIA 6150 and i really want to try it so……….. does beryl work on it?

]]> http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9812/comment-page-1/#comment-380353 Seth Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:19:21 +0000 http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9812/#comment-380353 I thought parallel's said that multiple core support as one of the things that they were saying was up and coming. I have to be honest though, after using Visual Studio 2005 via parallels on my mbp c2d, it is so much speedier than my windows box at work. I can only imagine that if I'm able to dedicate both cores to parallels that it will scream. i just wonder how osx will work if i'm using both cores for windows in parallels. anyway, i think if parallels gets the quick snapshot feature and of course the 3d accelleration support that it will take a lot to overtake them in the mac virtualization space. I thought parallel’s said that multiple core support as one of the things that they were saying was up and coming. I have to be honest though, after using Visual Studio 2005 via parallels on my mbp c2d, it is so much speedier than my windows box at work. I can only imagine that if I’m able to dedicate both cores to parallels that it will scream. i just wonder how osx will work if i’m using both cores for windows in parallels. anyway, i think if parallels gets the quick snapshot feature and of course the 3d accelleration support that it will take a lot to overtake them in the mac virtualization space.

]]> http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9812/comment-page-1/#comment-380344 Derek Fri, 02 Mar 2007 19:36:54 +0000 http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/9812/#comment-380344 I wanted to try this latest beta release with Vista but try as I might, I couldn't get the damn thing to boot off of the Vista disk. Jumped through various loops hoping to get it to work and it just doesn't. The only real benefit of VMWare that I see over Parallels is support for multiple cores. Unless I'm mistaken? Does Parallels provide that type of support? I wanted to try this latest beta release with Vista but try as I might, I couldn’t get the damn thing to boot off of the Vista disk. Jumped through various loops hoping to get it to work and it just doesn’t. The only real benefit of VMWare that I see over Parallels is support for multiple cores. Unless I’m mistaken? Does Parallels provide that type of support?

]]>