<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hack The AppleTV And Get Locked Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/10109/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/10109/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 01:17:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jed</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/10109/comment-page-1/#comment-382018</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 04:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/10109/#comment-382018</guid>
		<description>I think this is probably more along the lines of automated cron jobs running cleanup/permissions repair.  Someone needs to look into what the AppleTV does for self maintenance before pointing the finger at apple.  As tom said, Apple&#039;s never been the kind to do what everyone&#039;s accusing them of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is probably more along the lines of automated cron jobs running cleanup/permissions repair.  Someone needs to look into what the AppleTV does for self maintenance before pointing the finger at apple.  As tom said, Apple&#8217;s never been the kind to do what everyone&#8217;s accusing them of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/10109/comment-page-1/#comment-381968</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/10109/#comment-381968</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure this is nothing. Apple has never done any kind of invasive piracy &quot;protection&quot; before, a la Microsoft.

Jobs seems to understand that no piracy protection can possibly be effective, and its better to just trust your customer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure this is nothing. Apple has never done any kind of invasive piracy &#8220;protection&#8221; before, a la Microsoft.</p>
<p>Jobs seems to understand that no piracy protection can possibly be effective, and its better to just trust your customer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/10109/comment-page-1/#comment-381965</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 16:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/10109/#comment-381965</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m holding out for XMBC to be ported so that none of these surprises arise.

Ironic that Apple would be locking out some of its hacked units whereas Apple started out as a hack from two lads in a garage..

Apple you never cease to dissapoint us..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m holding out for XMBC to be ported so that none of these surprises arise.</p>
<p>Ironic that Apple would be locking out some of its hacked units whereas Apple started out as a hack from two lads in a garage..</p>
<p>Apple you never cease to dissapoint us..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phantomdata</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/10109/comment-page-1/#comment-381962</link>
		<dc:creator>phantomdata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/10109/#comment-381962</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an easy answer as to why Apple doesn&#039;t want you fooling around...  when the Apple TV 2.0 comes out with 1 new feature, they want to force you to buy it instead of download something from the internet for free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an easy answer as to why Apple doesn&#8217;t want you fooling around&#8230;  when the Apple TV 2.0 comes out with 1 new feature, they want to force you to buy it instead of download something from the internet for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GadgetDon</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/10109/comment-page-1/#comment-381951</link>
		<dc:creator>GadgetDon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/03/10109/#comment-381951</guid>
		<description>Actually, if you read the comments, most people are thinking that it&#039;s some sort of cron job that periodically repairs what looks like damage.

I suspect someone in the next week or so will figure out what it uses to determine a &quot;damaged&quot; file and find a way to mark the changes as proper.

Someone else will probably find a way to disable the auto-repairs.  And then scream about lousy quality control if problems slip in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, if you read the comments, most people are thinking that it&#8217;s some sort of cron job that periodically repairs what looks like damage.</p>
<p>I suspect someone in the next week or so will figure out what it uses to determine a &#8220;damaged&#8221; file and find a way to mark the changes as proper.</p>
<p>Someone else will probably find a way to disable the auto-repairs.  And then scream about lousy quality control if problems slip in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
