<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wireless Door Key</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/02/9634/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/02/9634/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 08:19:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pheen</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/02/9634/comment-page-1/#comment-379351</link>
		<dc:creator>pheen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/02/9634/#comment-379351</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t have to be recharged after 48 hours. They say the battery backup will last 48 hours if the power goes out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t have to be recharged after 48 hours. They say the battery backup will last 48 hours if the power goes out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas J. Brown</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/02/9634/comment-page-1/#comment-379184</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas J. Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/02/9634/#comment-379184</guid>
		<description>&quot;Uh oh, someone just hacked into my house and stole everthing&quot;

Yeah, it&#039;s called lock picking. This isn&#039;t any less safe than a regular lock.

And I agree, a fob that must be recharged every couple of days is lame. Why not just get an RFID chip in your hand and have a reader in the doorknob? That would be awesome. -)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Uh oh, someone just hacked into my house and stole everthing&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s called lock picking. This isn&#8217;t any less safe than a regular lock.</p>
<p>And I agree, a fob that must be recharged every couple of days is lame. Why not just get an RFID chip in your hand and have a reader in the doorknob? That would be awesome. -)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hitsuji</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/02/9634/comment-page-1/#comment-379165</link>
		<dc:creator>Hitsuji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/02/9634/#comment-379165</guid>
		<description>Uh oh, someone just hacked into my house and stole everthing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh oh, someone just hacked into my house and stole everthing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/02/9634/comment-page-1/#comment-379164</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/02/9634/#comment-379164</guid>
		<description>$290 and I have to recharge it every other day?  
Or I could just use my much-smaller regular key for free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$290 and I have to recharge it every other day?<br />
Or I could just use my much-smaller regular key for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/02/9634/comment-page-1/#comment-379162</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/02/9634/#comment-379162</guid>
		<description>either what you said or why not just use a number pad on your door???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>either what you said or why not just use a number pad on your door???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/02/9634/comment-page-1/#comment-379161</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 17:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/02/9634/#comment-379161</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the point if it&#039;s larger than a bunch of keys and has to be recharged overy 48 hours?
I would muck rather some kind of device like at the office here where a Credit Card sized key (actually a card) is in my wallet and when passed over a sensor opens a door.
Much, Much better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the point if it&#8217;s larger than a bunch of keys and has to be recharged overy 48 hours?<br />
I would muck rather some kind of device like at the office here where a Credit Card sized key (actually a card) is in my wallet and when passed over a sensor opens a door.<br />
Much, Much better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
