<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vista Watch:  Users Giving up too Many Rights?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9399/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9399/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:32:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9399/comment-page-1/#comment-377847</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9399/#comment-377847</guid>
		<description>Dan,  if you sound that article alarmist, would mroe along the same track make you scared of Vista?

Try this one: http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/420</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,  if you sound that article alarmist, would mroe along the same track make you scared of Vista?</p>
<p>Try this one: <a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/420" rel="nofollow">http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/420</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9399/comment-page-1/#comment-363628</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9399/#comment-363628</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read various opinions that claim that Microsoft might not have been, in fact, pushed to add the copyright protection systems, but instead did it to monopolize the content distribution industry.  It makes more sense, as I don&#039;t think the film industry would have near the clout or power to get Microsoft to change the OS so drastically.  The crazy systems are instead ways for Microsoft to force consumers who want content to use Vista, as many content distributors would prefer the outrageous safeguards Vista uses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read various opinions that claim that Microsoft might not have been, in fact, pushed to add the copyright protection systems, but instead did it to monopolize the content distribution industry.  It makes more sense, as I don&#8217;t think the film industry would have near the clout or power to get Microsoft to change the OS so drastically.  The crazy systems are instead ways for Microsoft to force consumers who want content to use Vista, as many content distributors would prefer the outrageous safeguards Vista uses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hax</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9399/comment-page-1/#comment-363508</link>
		<dc:creator>Hax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 21:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9399/#comment-363508</guid>
		<description>Yeah sure. But they must at least try, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah sure. But they must at least try, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Wilson</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9399/comment-page-1/#comment-363466</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9399/#comment-363466</guid>
		<description>Let me ask one question...

How many limitations that Microsoft has set in before the launch date have either been changed (for the looser) or hacked? Quite a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me ask one question&#8230;</p>
<p>How many limitations that Microsoft has set in before the launch date have either been changed (for the looser) or hacked? Quite a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hax</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9399/comment-page-1/#comment-363437</link>
		<dc:creator>Hax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9399/#comment-363437</guid>
		<description>Well, try to see the whole case through Microsoft&#039;s eyes:
If you really want people to stop pirating your products you need to take such drastical measures like binding the OS to specific hardware, repeatedly checking legitimicy and automatically deleting those little tools that undermine that strategy.

Ironically it won&#039;t work. And it will punish those who legally aquired Vista.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, try to see the whole case through Microsoft&#8217;s eyes:<br />
If you really want people to stop pirating your products you need to take such drastical measures like binding the OS to specific hardware, repeatedly checking legitimicy and automatically deleting those little tools that undermine that strategy.</p>
<p>Ironically it won&#8217;t work. And it will punish those who legally aquired Vista.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: viperguy</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9399/comment-page-1/#comment-363414</link>
		<dc:creator>viperguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9399/#comment-363414</guid>
		<description>&quot;deleting certain programs without the users knowledge&quot;
Isn&#039;t that a bit too much?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;deleting certain programs without the users knowledge&#8221;<br />
Isn&#8217;t that a bit too much?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
