Comments on: Is HD too detailed for porn? http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9306/ Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:14:26 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Matthew Rodgers http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9306/comment-page-1/#comment-356545 Matthew Rodgers Tue, 23 Jan 2007 15:51:38 +0000 http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9306/#comment-356545 Hmm. I'd rather get DVD-quality than see sagging eyes and sagging... thighs. (Hey! That rhymed.) Hmm. I’d rather get DVD-quality than see sagging eyes and sagging… thighs. (Hey! That rhymed.)

]]> By: Eric Cranston http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9306/comment-page-1/#comment-355780 Eric Cranston Tue, 23 Jan 2007 00:48:50 +0000 http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9306/#comment-355780 Film it in DVD quality and then stretch it and call it HD-DVD. Problem solved. Film it in DVD quality and then stretch it and call it HD-DVD. Problem solved.

]]> By: Don Wilson http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9306/comment-page-1/#comment-355532 Don Wilson Mon, 22 Jan 2007 19:40:39 +0000 http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/01/9306/#comment-355532 Heaven forbid we see realness in generic bimbo porn. Heaven forbid we see realness in generic bimbo porn.

]]>