<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Rips Apple&#8217;s Workgroup Manager Icon?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:53:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nic</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/comment-page-1/#comment-397444</link>
		<dc:creator>Nic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/#comment-397444</guid>
		<description>Ha! If you&#039;ve got Windows Live Hotmail, check out the site&#039;s icon in the title bar. I only just noticed it then. Basically, it&#039;s a grey background, and a white apple icon.
Is that really legal? There is no reason for Microsoft to use an apple icon, and they&#039;re in direct competition. I didn&#039;t know that Microsoft owned part of Apple. Interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha! If you&#8217;ve got Windows Live Hotmail, check out the site&#8217;s icon in the title bar. I only just noticed it then. Basically, it&#8217;s a grey background, and a white apple icon.<br />
Is that really legal? There is no reason for Microsoft to use an apple icon, and they&#8217;re in direct competition. I didn&#8217;t know that Microsoft owned part of Apple. Interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/comment-page-1/#comment-316673</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 01:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/#comment-316673</guid>
		<description>I keep hearing here that Microsoft keeps ripping off apple, but the point is Microsoft&#039;s own a bit of apple anyway, so they are more then able to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep hearing here that Microsoft keeps ripping off apple, but the point is Microsoft&#8217;s own a bit of apple anyway, so they are more then able to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SimonSez</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/comment-page-1/#comment-316135</link>
		<dc:creator>SimonSez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 10:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/#comment-316135</guid>
		<description>FYI. The Mac didn&#039;t support multithreading until MICROSOFT showed APPLE how to do it... NOW WHAT B!TCH? STEP BACK!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI. The Mac didn&#8217;t support multithreading until MICROSOFT showed APPLE how to do it&#8230; NOW WHAT B!TCH? STEP BACK!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/comment-page-1/#comment-315836</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/#comment-315836</guid>
		<description>The ads are provided by a third party vendor, that scans for keywords - There is no real hate for Microsoft on my end, I think they are a company who has run out of ideas.  They need new fresh blood to surge through its once vibrant veins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ads are provided by a third party vendor, that scans for keywords &#8211; There is no real hate for Microsoft on my end, I think they are a company who has run out of ideas.  They need new fresh blood to surge through its once vibrant veins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/comment-page-1/#comment-315831</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 01:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/#comment-315831</guid>
		<description>All of this Microsoft negativity, but yet in the Uneasy feed, there&#039;s an add for Microsoft Visual Studio 2005. Why hate Microsoft so much if you guys allow ads from them!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of this Microsoft negativity, but yet in the Uneasy feed, there&#8217;s an add for Microsoft Visual Studio 2005. Why hate Microsoft so much if you guys allow ads from them!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: none@non</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/comment-page-1/#comment-315790</link>
		<dc:creator>none@non</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2006 00:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/#comment-315790</guid>
		<description>Why cant people realize that companies buy packages of stock photos and clip art and they also sell their own. Just because one company used a picture, doesn&#039;t mean they own it, they created it.
Its even more plausible with the backgrounds, do you think they give someone a camera and say, go shoot some pretty pictures for us?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why cant people realize that companies buy packages of stock photos and clip art and they also sell their own. Just because one company used a picture, doesn&#8217;t mean they own it, they created it.<br />
Its even more plausible with the backgrounds, do you think they give someone a camera and say, go shoot some pretty pictures for us?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/comment-page-1/#comment-315724</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/#comment-315724</guid>
		<description>I think the new icon is better, in the sense of what it represents, because it was talking about purchasing copies for multiple systems.  The apple icon had nothing to do with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the new icon is better, in the sense of what it represents, because it was talking about purchasing copies for multiple systems.  The apple icon had nothing to do with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/comment-page-1/#comment-315688</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/#comment-315688</guid>
		<description>LOL.  it&#039;s already been changed on the Microsoft site.  The replaced the one they stole from Apple with a really pathetic and crappy icon.  The site is still spelled wrong though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL.  it&#8217;s already been changed on the Microsoft site.  The replaced the one they stole from Apple with a really pathetic and crappy icon.  The site is still spelled wrong though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/comment-page-1/#comment-315681</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/#comment-315681</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ve replaced the icon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve replaced the icon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wally</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/comment-page-1/#comment-315667</link>
		<dc:creator>Wally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/8745/#comment-315667</guid>
		<description>Since the Apple page touts that this is all built on Open Source Software, are we 100% sure that the Icon in question isn&#039;t a freely available icon, perhaps borrowed by Apple as well?

Wally</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the Apple page touts that this is all built on Open Source Software, are we 100% sure that the Icon in question isn&#8217;t a freely available icon, perhaps borrowed by Apple as well?</p>
<p>Wally</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
