<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speed up Your Web Browsing: Fasterfox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/4759/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/4759/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:28:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex B</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/4759/comment-page-1/#comment-318916</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 10:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4759#comment-318916</guid>
		<description>Are you sure this will work, because I used Google Web Accelerator last week, and it actually lagged my browser MORE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure this will work, because I used Google Web Accelerator last week, and it actually lagged my browser MORE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Oakes</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/4759/comment-page-1/#comment-318872</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Oakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4759#comment-318872</guid>
		<description>Here one speed tip:

Use Opera!

Google web accelerator doesnt work it in same way, it preloads all the links on a page, making it seam faster but it also uses up more of the webnsites, and your own, bandwidth. Not good. Fasterfox looks like it just tweaks some setting to make it go faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here one speed tip:</p>
<p>Use Opera!</p>
<p>Google web accelerator doesnt work it in same way, it preloads all the links on a page, making it seam faster but it also uses up more of the webnsites, and your own, bandwidth. Not good. Fasterfox looks like it just tweaks some setting to make it go faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/4759/comment-page-1/#comment-318464</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4759#comment-318464</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused, how do I use the timer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused, how do I use the timer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: king</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/4759/comment-page-1/#comment-318457</link>
		<dc:creator>king</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4759#comment-318457</guid>
		<description>it DOES load faster!
i wonder how they do that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it DOES load faster!<br />
i wonder how they do that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/4759/comment-page-1/#comment-318452</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4759#comment-318452</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve been using Google Web Accelerator: http://webaccelerator.google.com/ since it came out last year, it works on the same principle, but since it was from google, it got more publicity, bad and good.  It&#039;s the same thing, and according to it, ive saved days of time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve been using Google Web Accelerator: <a href="http://webaccelerator.google.com/" rel="nofollow">http://webaccelerator.google.com/</a> since it came out last year, it works on the same principle, but since it was from google, it got more publicity, bad and good.  It&#8217;s the same thing, and according to it, ive saved days of time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dogcow</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/4759/comment-page-1/#comment-318426</link>
		<dc:creator>Dogcow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4759#comment-318426</guid>
		<description>Like kibby said, make sure to go into adons and change the preferencs of fasterfox to optimized or less to be within RFC specs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like kibby said, make sure to go into adons and change the preferencs of fasterfox to optimized or less to be within RFC specs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/4759/comment-page-1/#comment-318427</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4759#comment-318427</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Fasterfox for a while, and I&#039;ve never had any problems with it.  It&#039;s convenient to see how long a page loads, especially when you&#039;re developing your own sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Fasterfox for a while, and I&#8217;ve never had any problems with it.  It&#8217;s convenient to see how long a page loads, especially when you&#8217;re developing your own sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kibby</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/4759/comment-page-1/#comment-318422</link>
		<dc:creator>Kibby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4759#comment-318422</guid>
		<description>Please keep in mind that some of these settings are known to drive server admins mad. Be nice please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please keep in mind that some of these settings are known to drive server admins mad. Be nice please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/4759/comment-page-1/#comment-318418</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 21:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4759#comment-318418</guid>
		<description>Can you revert back to OEM settings if these crap out?  Sounds kinda like overclocking to me.  The link has no info on this one...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you revert back to OEM settings if these crap out?  Sounds kinda like overclocking to me.  The link has no info on this one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/12/4759/comment-page-1/#comment-318382</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 20:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4759#comment-318382</guid>
		<description>Now don&#039;t spend that one second all in one place!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now don&#8217;t spend that one second all in one place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
