<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Putting airbangs in airplanes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/11/8404/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/11/8404/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:23:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/11/8404/comment-page-1/#comment-295662</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 18:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/11/8404/#comment-295662</guid>
		<description>Actually there is an easier way to up the survivability of crashes.  That is turn the seats around facing backwards.  This is already a requirement on military transports.  Only problem is passengers don&#039;t like it much, of course last time I checked passengers also don&#039;t like severe injuries either

As far as most air crashes being surviveable, this is true.  I took several classes concerning air crash analysis as part of my bachlor degree.  85% of all crashes are surviveable.  80% of those who die due to impact in surviveable crash are made up of the crew(pilots) and first class passengers (there is justice in the world).  Nearly 90% of all the deaths in this type of crash are from smoke inhallation.  So in other words that lovely airbag is going to help you survive a near instant death just so that can have a much slower more agonizing death by suffocating then burning to death.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually there is an easier way to up the survivability of crashes.  That is turn the seats around facing backwards.  This is already a requirement on military transports.  Only problem is passengers don&#8217;t like it much, of course last time I checked passengers also don&#8217;t like severe injuries either</p>
<p>As far as most air crashes being surviveable, this is true.  I took several classes concerning air crash analysis as part of my bachlor degree.  85% of all crashes are surviveable.  80% of those who die due to impact in surviveable crash are made up of the crew(pilots) and first class passengers (there is justice in the world).  Nearly 90% of all the deaths in this type of crash are from smoke inhallation.  So in other words that lovely airbag is going to help you survive a near instant death just so that can have a much slower more agonizing death by suffocating then burning to death.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/11/8404/comment-page-1/#comment-295525</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/11/8404/#comment-295525</guid>
		<description>(...said...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(&#8230;said&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/11/8404/comment-page-1/#comment-295522</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 13:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/11/8404/#comment-295522</guid>
		<description>These could be useful for non-total-destruction accidents.  Going off the runway, stuff like that.  But if you drop like a rock from 30k+ feet?  Better be a damn good airbag.

Like the comedian side, &quot;How far can one engine take us?  All the way to the crash site.  We&#039;ll even beat the ambulances...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These could be useful for non-total-destruction accidents.  Going off the runway, stuff like that.  But if you drop like a rock from 30k+ feet?  Better be a damn good airbag.</p>
<p>Like the comedian side, &#8220;How far can one engine take us?  All the way to the crash site.  We&#8217;ll even beat the ambulances&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David:moua</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/11/8404/comment-page-1/#comment-295339</link>
		<dc:creator>David:moua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/11/8404/#comment-295339</guid>
		<description>What if the plane crash at 250 miles/h ?
If a plane crash, it will be more likely at this minimum speed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if the plane crash at 250 miles/h ?<br />
If a plane crash, it will be more likely at this minimum speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex B</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/11/8404/comment-page-1/#comment-294955</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/11/8404/#comment-294955</guid>
		<description>&quot;Built into specially equipped seatbelts&quot;? What if you put on your seatbelt all twisted up? That wouldn&#039;t be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Built into specially equipped seatbelts&#8221;? What if you put on your seatbelt all twisted up? That wouldn&#8217;t be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
