Created in early 2004, UNEASYsilence aims to deliver daily coverage of offbeat & generally geeky news. Subscribe via RSS or Email.

READING single

DRM Dumpster – Automating the un-DRMing process

Posted in AV, Apple, Entertainment, Geeky, Tech by Derek at 10:00 am
closeThis post was published 3 years 8 days ago and its content may not be valid anymore.

One of the oldest tricks in the book for unlocked DRM locked audio files purchased off of the iTunes Music Store is to rip the audio tracks, then re-import the files back into iTunes. A tedious yet highly accurate method of unlocking files which you should have free-access to for purchasing. However, as previously stated, the task is incredibly tedious and time consuming. Fortunately, there are little conveniences such as the DRM Dumpster which automate the process:

Screenshot of DRM Dumpster

DRM Dumpster is free software. However, it takes a lot of work to produce software like DRM Dumpster so if you can afford it we ask that you please donate. Your donation gives us the computers and the time that we need to make this software for your. Please support us if you can.

The OS X application will seek out any locked files in your music library, burn them to disk, the re-import the files with little input required from the user. Completely legal, complete convenience, complete control.

5 Responses to “DRM Dumpster – Automating the un-DRMing process”

  1. Mark says:

    Thanks for this link, Derek.

  2. Stumbled upon your website just last week I was looking for something to do just this with little success, thanks for the link and thanks for the site!

  3. Roger says:

    Cool, thanks. Automation makes the task kinda fun rather than a huge drag (I REALLY resent not being able to just move around music that I just paid to download!).

  4. Kazaki says:

    AAC?

  5. Hybrid says:

    This means re-encoding an already encoded track to AIFF and then back again to MP3/AAC?

    My guess is that it really effects the sound quality of the song. Sure it is DRM free but of a porer quality.

    Or not?

Additional comments powered by BackType