<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hmmmm, study suggests cellphones may make men sterile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:51:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sanya</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/comment-page-1/#comment-275476</link>
		<dc:creator>sanya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/#comment-275476</guid>
		<description>so much for the old saying ,there is lots of fish in the sea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so much for the old saying ,there is lots of fish in the sea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/comment-page-1/#comment-275140</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 10:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/#comment-275140</guid>
		<description>phonesex is a conspiracy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phonesex is a conspiracy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wash Jones</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/comment-page-1/#comment-274914</link>
		<dc:creator>Wash Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/#comment-274914</guid>
		<description>Ow, my sperm!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ow, my sperm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Rodgers</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/comment-page-1/#comment-274896</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Rodgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 01:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/#comment-274896</guid>
		<description>It looks like we found a replacement for condoms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like we found a replacement for condoms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClaMs</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/comment-page-1/#comment-274859</link>
		<dc:creator>ClaMs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/#comment-274859</guid>
		<description>...man, someone really needs to be knocked up.  * not pointing fingers*

From now on I&#039;ll be keeping my mobile in my breast pocket; I&#039;d rather have brain cancer (or whatever you can get from having your brain fried) then lose my sperm activity.

Here&#039;s my serious 2cents: People who use their mobile phones for more then 4 hours are busy people for sure (duh!), which means that they&#039;ve surely got stuff to stress them out (now you see my point). Maybe THAT&#039;s what&#039;s lowering the sperm count.

In this day and age, people without a mobile phone must be the most relaxed people on earth. No stress to affect the sess (that&#039;s &quot;sex&quot; in my language). So with a similar test, they could find out that people who wear suits have a smaller chance of procreating, then people who sit on couches

Anyone agree with me that it&#039;s just a coincidence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;man, someone really needs to be knocked up.  * not pointing fingers*</p>
<p>From now on I&#8217;ll be keeping my mobile in my breast pocket; I&#8217;d rather have brain cancer (or whatever you can get from having your brain fried) then lose my sperm activity.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my serious 2cents: People who use their mobile phones for more then 4 hours are busy people for sure (duh!), which means that they&#8217;ve surely got stuff to stress them out (now you see my point). Maybe THAT&#8217;s what&#8217;s lowering the sperm count.</p>
<p>In this day and age, people without a mobile phone must be the most relaxed people on earth. No stress to affect the sess (that&#8217;s &#8220;sex&#8221; in my language). So with a similar test, they could find out that people who wear suits have a smaller chance of procreating, then people who sit on couches</p>
<p>Anyone agree with me that it&#8217;s just a coincidence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norra Haras</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/comment-page-1/#comment-274835</link>
		<dc:creator>Norra Haras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 00:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/#comment-274835</guid>
		<description>This is crap.  How many of you men are actively trying to bear children, but are failing?  I&#039;ve heard crap like this for my whole life: don&#039;t do that it&#039;ll make you sterile!  

If you are a smart person you would know that the world doesn&#039;t need your spawn.  If you are not smart, then the world REALLY doesn&#039;t need your spawn.

Ladies: rejoice in low sperm counts.  Your freedom may depend on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is crap.  How many of you men are actively trying to bear children, but are failing?  I&#8217;ve heard crap like this for my whole life: don&#8217;t do that it&#8217;ll make you sterile!  </p>
<p>If you are a smart person you would know that the world doesn&#8217;t need your spawn.  If you are not smart, then the world REALLY doesn&#8217;t need your spawn.</p>
<p>Ladies: rejoice in low sperm counts.  Your freedom may depend on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emory</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/comment-page-1/#comment-274825</link>
		<dc:creator>emory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/#comment-274825</guid>
		<description>almost as scary as fox news. Today, at a genetics conference, I was told that there is some cancer that can be spread by a virus, and that stem cells cause cancer. A few weeks ago, we heard that NC has the atom bomb. The world is a scary place indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>almost as scary as fox news. Today, at a genetics conference, I was told that there is some cancer that can be spread by a virus, and that stem cells cause cancer. A few weeks ago, we heard that NC has the atom bomb. The world is a scary place indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/comment-page-1/#comment-274800</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/10/8050/#comment-274800</guid>
		<description>Man, that stuff&#039;s scary!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, that stuff&#8217;s scary!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
