<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Finally &#8230; A straight answer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6587/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6587/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:53:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HK</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6587/comment-page-1/#comment-197207</link>
		<dc:creator>HK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6587/#comment-197207</guid>
		<description>I just happened upon this site (actually during a seacrh to see photos of the 3 armed infant) so I am not familiar with the context or nature of this forum.  Thus, if I&#039;m missing the point in responding I apologize.  That said, I am a med student and biology is a big part and its worth noting that besides the conventional shell structure, the female reproductive gamete ( reproductive cell with half the required chromosomal material) is refered to as a egg.  Cell theory states that all matter is made up of cells and all cells come from pre-existing cells, which still leaves the initial question up to debate, but it would suffice to say that the egg, in the cellular sense of the word, came first.  If I&#039;ve totally missed the point I apologize for wasting space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just happened upon this site (actually during a seacrh to see photos of the 3 armed infant) so I am not familiar with the context or nature of this forum.  Thus, if I&#8217;m missing the point in responding I apologize.  That said, I am a med student and biology is a big part and its worth noting that besides the conventional shell structure, the female reproductive gamete ( reproductive cell with half the required chromosomal material) is refered to as a egg.  Cell theory states that all matter is made up of cells and all cells come from pre-existing cells, which still leaves the initial question up to debate, but it would suffice to say that the egg, in the cellular sense of the word, came first.  If I&#8217;ve totally missed the point I apologize for wasting space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClaMs</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6587/comment-page-1/#comment-197188</link>
		<dc:creator>ClaMs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6587/#comment-197188</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have logs of when this question was asked in the first UES forum? I wish I could compare the answers we mentioned back then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have logs of when this question was asked in the first UES forum? I wish I could compare the answers we mentioned back then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6587/comment-page-1/#comment-197121</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 07:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6587/#comment-197121</guid>
		<description>I read an article like this about 3 years ago.  Sadly, I got into an &quot;arguement&quot; with a &quot;friend&quot; of mine and needless to say, I won.

Considering this bit of information, we can conclude that all species are just genetic defects of the species before them.  That&#039;s what evolution is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read an article like this about 3 years ago.  Sadly, I got into an &#8220;arguement&#8221; with a &#8220;friend&#8221; of mine and needless to say, I won.</p>
<p>Considering this bit of information, we can conclude that all species are just genetic defects of the species before them.  That&#8217;s what evolution is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClaMs</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6587/comment-page-1/#comment-197102</link>
		<dc:creator>ClaMs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 06:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6587/#comment-197102</guid>
		<description>I knew it, I knew it, I knew it. Oh gosh. I&#039;ll have to print this article and keep a copy of it in bag. Then as soon someone mentions the &#039;Chicken or Egg&#039; question, I&#039;ll pop this out. I knew it!

So now we have to bother ourselves, and the next couple of generations with other useless questions... Any thoughts anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew it, I knew it, I knew it. Oh gosh. I&#8217;ll have to print this article and keep a copy of it in bag. Then as soon someone mentions the &#8216;Chicken or Egg&#8217; question, I&#8217;ll pop this out. I knew it!</p>
<p>So now we have to bother ourselves, and the next couple of generations with other useless questions&#8230; Any thoughts anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6587/comment-page-1/#comment-197005</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 01:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6587/#comment-197005</guid>
		<description>Soo...does this mean we are all inbred too?  Am I the only one who sees the obvious relation to Adam and Eve?  Two genetically odd monkeys starting off to make an entire race!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soo&#8230;does this mean we are all inbred too?  Am I the only one who sees the obvious relation to Adam and Eve?  Two genetically odd monkeys starting off to make an entire race!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6587/comment-page-1/#comment-196993</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 00:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/06/6587/#comment-196993</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad this debate has been laid to rest. I guess we all knew that it would be explained by evolution somehow. It must have been a gradual process to turn into chicken, and there were probably plenty of hybrid changes in the process. Well, one of life&#039;s mysteries solved!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad this debate has been laid to rest. I guess we all knew that it would be explained by evolution somehow. It must have been a gradual process to turn into chicken, and there were probably plenty of hybrid changes in the process. Well, one of life&#8217;s mysteries solved!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
