<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo&#8217;s new frontpage?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:53:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alex cd</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/comment-page-1/#comment-172309</link>
		<dc:creator>alex cd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/#comment-172309</guid>
		<description>I would never be caught with yahoo in my history, it sucks! Google is perfect the way it is simple but advanced when you want it to be</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would never be caught with yahoo in my history, it sucks! Google is perfect the way it is simple but advanced when you want it to be</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/comment-page-1/#comment-172302</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/#comment-172302</guid>
		<description>That Google picture is alright. I like the look of the field, tabs, and the buttons. but I hate that blue on top and bottom, too distracting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Google picture is alright. I like the look of the field, tabs, and the buttons. but I hate that blue on top and bottom, too distracting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/comment-page-1/#comment-172301</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/#comment-172301</guid>
		<description>Google themeself have said &quot;The clean design  of the site makes it abundantly clear how to proceed and offers little to distract the user in search of information.&quot;

Google will never add any more to it&#039;s pages then is absolutly needed, but will remain to design the site just to the point where it is visually good looking. Google has the fastest search engine, and if you think about it, if they put a bunch of &quot;crap&quot; on it&#039;s pages, those pages will load slower, which is a bad thing.

I mean come on, You have a Personalized Home page on Google, that is much better looking then the default google.com, I love the personalized home page, and it does not have those ugly colors like My MSN or My Yahoo&#039;s.

Google you rock!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google themeself have said &#8220;The clean design  of the site makes it abundantly clear how to proceed and offers little to distract the user in search of information.&#8221;</p>
<p>Google will never add any more to it&#8217;s pages then is absolutly needed, but will remain to design the site just to the point where it is visually good looking. Google has the fastest search engine, and if you think about it, if they put a bunch of &#8220;crap&#8221; on it&#8217;s pages, those pages will load slower, which is a bad thing.</p>
<p>I mean come on, You have a Personalized Home page on Google, that is much better looking then the default google.com, I love the personalized home page, and it does not have those ugly colors like My MSN or My Yahoo&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Google you rock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/comment-page-1/#comment-172192</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 16:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/#comment-172192</guid>
		<description>Needless to say, I think that most (not everyone) feel they need a visual (and usability) update. Will they get it &quot;right&quot; is the real question!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Needless to say, I think that most (not everyone) feel they need a visual (and usability) update. Will they get it &#8220;right&#8221; is the real question!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/comment-page-1/#comment-172191</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 16:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/#comment-172191</guid>
		<description>The Google screenshot looks pretty easy to do in firefox.  I feel myself modivated. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Google screenshot looks pretty easy to do in firefox.  I feel myself modivated. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/comment-page-1/#comment-172186</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 16:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/#comment-172186</guid>
		<description>I think that while RutledgeÃ‚Â´s redesign of google homepage obviously looks nicer, it brings new design problems, for example, the new design looks a lot like Microsoft wich i think is not good for GoogleÃ‚Â´s bussiness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that while RutledgeÃ‚Â´s redesign of google homepage obviously looks nicer, it brings new design problems, for example, the new design looks a lot like Microsoft wich i think is not good for GoogleÃ‚Â´s bussiness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emory Roane</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/comment-page-1/#comment-172173</link>
		<dc:creator>Emory Roane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 15:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/#comment-172173</guid>
		<description>Personally, I believe that the current google homepage is perfect. I completely agree that Yahoo&#039;s is much too heavy. The simplicity is the greatest part, no distractions, just information. I&#039;d hate it if Google started looking like Yahoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I believe that the current google homepage is perfect. I completely agree that Yahoo&#8217;s is much too heavy. The simplicity is the greatest part, no distractions, just information. I&#8217;d hate it if Google started looking like Yahoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/comment-page-1/#comment-172172</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 15:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/#comment-172172</guid>
		<description>anything is possible which is the reason i said &quot;possible&quot;. possible, as in the next google redesign may very well look similar to andy rutledge&#039;s interpretation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>anything is possible which is the reason i said &#8220;possible&#8221;. possible, as in the next google redesign may very well look similar to andy rutledge&#8217;s interpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boohiss</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/comment-page-1/#comment-172170</link>
		<dc:creator>boohiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/#comment-172170</guid>
		<description>Calling it a &quot;possible&quot; redesign is pretty vague and (I believe) misleading.  Anything is possible, but that Google redesign was done by someone in no way affiliated with Google.  I could draw a picture of a car and claim it was a &quot;possible&quot; new line for Ford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calling it a &#8220;possible&#8221; redesign is pretty vague and (I believe) misleading.  Anything is possible, but that Google redesign was done by someone in no way affiliated with Google.  I could draw a picture of a car and claim it was a &#8220;possible&#8221; new line for Ford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Anderson</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/comment-page-1/#comment-172169</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5319/#comment-172169</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like heavy designs like Yahoo!&#039;s. I&#039;d rather not have so much useless crap on the homepage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like heavy designs like Yahoo!&#8217;s. I&#8217;d rather not have so much useless crap on the homepage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
