<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Talk for GMail is out in the wild</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:14:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/comment-page-1/#comment-172379</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/#comment-172379</guid>
		<description>ridiculous! free wifi for international sbux&#039;s but not stateside?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ridiculous! free wifi for international sbux&#8217;s but not stateside?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrazyBarbour</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/comment-page-1/#comment-172359</link>
		<dc:creator>CrazyBarbour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/#comment-172359</guid>
		<description>:O Over her in the UK it&#039;s free.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:O Over her in the UK it&#8217;s free&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/comment-page-1/#comment-172343</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/#comment-172343</guid>
		<description>starbucks!? why pay for wifi these days? sbux is the worst place to go for wifi because you have to pay. i never understood why starbucks didn&#039;t jump on the free wifi bandwagon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>starbucks!? why pay for wifi these days? sbux is the worst place to go for wifi because you have to pay. i never understood why starbucks didn&#8217;t jump on the free wifi bandwagon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrazyBarbour</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/comment-page-1/#comment-172331</link>
		<dc:creator>CrazyBarbour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/#comment-172331</guid>
		<description>Well they should just carry about there laptops.... and go to like a Starbucks for a wifi connection! lol
Altho I sort of can get why they would want it, but I just don&#039;t have a use for it at present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well they should just carry about there laptops&#8230;. and go to like a Starbucks for a wifi connection! lol<br />
Altho I sort of can get why they would want it, but I just don&#8217;t have a use for it at present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/comment-page-1/#comment-172288</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/#comment-172288</guid>
		<description>you guys are forgetting about users who access their contacts from public terminals. no download or installation needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you guys are forgetting about users who access their contacts from public terminals. no download or installation needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anand</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/comment-page-1/#comment-172245</link>
		<dc:creator>Anand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/#comment-172245</guid>
		<description>I agree with CrazyBabrour. Other than it helping in adding to the userbase, it doesn&#039;t make any sense at all. The desktop client is pretty fine! 
And will it not lead to organizations blocking Gmail access to their employees??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with CrazyBabrour. Other than it helping in adding to the userbase, it doesn&#8217;t make any sense at all. The desktop client is pretty fine!<br />
And will it not lead to organizations blocking Gmail access to their employees??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrazyBarbour</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/comment-page-1/#comment-172229</link>
		<dc:creator>CrazyBarbour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 21:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/#comment-172229</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t exactly see why you need Google Talk  integrated into your browser, when you can just have the desktop client, or in my case Adium.....! 
Well I suppose it would be useful to some.... just not really me :P

Joe - Google Talk is really popular, I thought, .... I prefer it over MSN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t exactly see why you need Google Talk  integrated into your browser, when you can just have the desktop client, or in my case Adium&#8230;..!<br />
Well I suppose it would be useful to some&#8230;. just not really me :P</p>
<p>Joe &#8211; Google Talk is really popular, I thought, &#8230;. I prefer it over MSN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NOGG3R5</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/comment-page-1/#comment-172151</link>
		<dc:creator>NOGG3R5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 12:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/#comment-172151</guid>
		<description>I use Gtalk, its great, its light enough to run alongside MSN, so i have contacts on both!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Gtalk, its great, its light enough to run alongside MSN, so i have contacts on both!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Anderson</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/comment-page-1/#comment-172137</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 10:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/#comment-172137</guid>
		<description>I think the only reason this was released is because no one uses Google Talk, and they believed integrating it into Gmail would increase it&#039;s uservase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the only reason this was released is because no one uses Google Talk, and they believed integrating it into Gmail would increase it&#8217;s uservase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nogg3r5</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/comment-page-1/#comment-172130</link>
		<dc:creator>nogg3r5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 07:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/02/5318/#comment-172130</guid>
		<description>Cool, i get it now. Never managed to get my head around that one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, i get it now. Never managed to get my head around that one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
