Comments on: Mac Mondays: You can’t have your cake and eat it too… http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/01/5210/ Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:53:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: ikonQ http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/01/5210/comment-page-1/#comment-170318 ikonQ Wed, 01 Feb 2006 14:47:49 +0000 http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/01/5210/#comment-170318 Yeah, I've gotta jump on the "I dont care" bus either. Seriously, I bought a Mac so that i could get away from Windows XP and the associated headaches... Yeah, I’ve gotta jump on the “I dont care” bus either. Seriously, I bought a Mac so that i could get away from Windows XP and the associated headaches…

]]> By: Adam http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/01/5210/comment-page-1/#comment-170204 Adam Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:00:11 +0000 http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/01/5210/#comment-170204 I think it *should*. I own both a Mac and PC and I boot the PC only to do two things: 1) play games 2) run software that only runs on PC and needs speed (ie. won't run or run well in Virtual PC) ... other than that, it just sits there powered off. I'd love to have *one* machine that would fulfill both purposes. I think it *should*. I own both a Mac and PC and I boot the PC only to do two things:

1) play games
2) run software that only runs on PC and needs speed (ie. won’t run or run well in Virtual PC)

… other than that, it just sits there powered off. I’d love to have *one* machine that would fulfill both purposes.

]]> By: Mike http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/01/5210/comment-page-1/#comment-170195 Mike Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:32:51 +0000 http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/01/5210/#comment-170195 well one reason would be interoperability, there are plenty of windows users that can't let go of their windows software and plenty of mac users that haven't let go. I agree with Adam though this could be very back for mac and mac users in the long run. well one reason would be interoperability, there are plenty of windows users that can’t let go of their windows software and plenty of mac users that haven’t let go. I agree with Adam though this could be very back for mac and mac users in the long run.

]]> By: Stridey http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/01/5210/comment-page-1/#comment-170185 Stridey Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:28:46 +0000 http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/01/5210/#comment-170185 Hear hear! Well said sir. Hear hear! Well said sir.

]]> By: Kyle http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/01/5210/comment-page-1/#comment-170174 Kyle Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:42:52 +0000 http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/01/5210/#comment-170174 Everyone is so concerned with *can* a Intel Mac run Windows, but nobody seems to care much about whether it *should*. Glad to see your post on it. I just don't see any reason to run a crappy OS(Windows) on good Mac hardware. OSX is so much better it ain't even close. Everyone is so concerned with *can* a Intel Mac run Windows, but nobody seems to care much about whether it *should*. Glad to see your post on it. I just don’t see any reason to run a crappy OS(Windows) on good Mac hardware. OSX is so much better it ain’t even close.

]]> By: Justin http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/01/5210/comment-page-1/#comment-170171 Justin Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:19:27 +0000 http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2006/01/5210/#comment-170171 I really wouldn't plague a mac with windows xp...i mean windows vista, maybe, but definetly not windows xp. I really wouldn’t plague a mac with windows xp…i mean windows vista, maybe, but definetly not windows xp.

]]>