<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Explorer Destroyer &#8211; Forcing IE usage below 50%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/11/4575/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/11/4575/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:18:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/11/4575/comment-page-1/#comment-137931</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4575#comment-137931</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for promoting browsers that offer better css support than IE, but Explorer Destroyer is wrong on so many levels, Joe Anderson makes a very good point about freedom and the ethics of firefox.

Personally i think the Explorer Destroyer warnings are as pushy as a Double Glazing salesman on commission, the whole thing stinks of cheap sales talk. Visitors will be put off by this. Some people don&#039;t even know that other browsers even exist and they trust MS and IE without question because they don&#039;t know any better - the Explorer Destroyer comes across as spam, which is what it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for promoting browsers that offer better css support than IE, but Explorer Destroyer is wrong on so many levels, Joe Anderson makes a very good point about freedom and the ethics of firefox.</p>
<p>Personally i think the Explorer Destroyer warnings are as pushy as a Double Glazing salesman on commission, the whole thing stinks of cheap sales talk. Visitors will be put off by this. Some people don&#8217;t even know that other browsers even exist and they trust MS and IE without question because they don&#8217;t know any better &#8211; the Explorer Destroyer comes across as spam, which is what it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Anderson</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/11/4575/comment-page-1/#comment-122213</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 11:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4575#comment-122213</guid>
		<description>I think this goes against everything Firefox stands for, freedom.

By forcing people to use Firefox you are taking away your freedom. Also, if Firefox get&#039;s too popular it will become very insecure like IE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this goes against everything Firefox stands for, freedom.</p>
<p>By forcing people to use Firefox you are taking away your freedom. Also, if Firefox get&#8217;s too popular it will become very insecure like IE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dombi</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/11/4575/comment-page-1/#comment-122040</link>
		<dc:creator>dombi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 06:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4575#comment-122040</guid>
		<description>Derek, if you need an IE version of the Too Cool sign, visit our website. I fixed the code for IE. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek, if you need an IE version of the Too Cool sign, visit our website. I fixed the code for IE. :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .: UNEASYsilence :. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kill Bill&#8217;s Browser - Take the web. With a vengeance.</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/11/4575/comment-page-1/#comment-121965</link>
		<dc:creator>.: UNEASYsilence :. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Kill Bill&#8217;s Browser - Take the web. With a vengeance.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2005 05:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4575#comment-121965</guid>
		<description>[...] A more humorous take compared to Destroyer Explorer for ridding the net of Internet Explorer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A more humorous take compared to Destroyer Explorer for ridding the net of Internet Explorer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/11/4575/comment-page-1/#comment-120903</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 19:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4575#comment-120903</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know of a website that list Firefox or IE unfriendly sites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know of a website that list Firefox or IE unfriendly sites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jace</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/11/4575/comment-page-1/#comment-120888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 19:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4575#comment-120888</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve reached plenty of pages that won&#039;t allow Firefox, so I have a hard time feeling sympathy towards IE for anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve reached plenty of pages that won&#8217;t allow Firefox, so I have a hard time feeling sympathy towards IE for anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/11/4575/comment-page-1/#comment-120885</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4575#comment-120885</guid>
		<description>The too cool for IE version is a much more subtle and respective method for promoting alternative browsers. Unfortunately, the transparent ribbon or button PNGs or GIFs do not always display correctly in IE :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The too cool for IE version is a much more subtle and respective method for promoting alternative browsers. Unfortunately, the transparent ribbon or button PNGs or GIFs do not always display correctly in IE :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dombi</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/11/4575/comment-page-1/#comment-120799</link>
		<dc:creator>dombi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=4575#comment-120799</guid>
		<description>Here is a similar approach, from a different website. They place a &quot;Too Cool for IE&quot; image somewhere (usually in the bottom right corner) on the webpage. This image then links back to their site promoting other browsers. 

Some find might find this a little much, but then again there are plenty of websites out there that are optimized for IE, and leave the rest outside.

http://www.w3junkies.com/toocool/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a similar approach, from a different website. They place a &#8220;Too Cool for IE&#8221; image somewhere (usually in the bottom right corner) on the webpage. This image then links back to their site promoting other browsers. </p>
<p>Some find might find this a little much, but then again there are plenty of websites out there that are optimized for IE, and leave the rest outside.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.w3junkies.com/toocool/" rel="nofollow">http://www.w3junkies.com/toocool/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
