<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why is everyone nitpicking 320px videos?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:40:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/comment-page-1/#comment-80521</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/#comment-80521</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t adress the fact that people wanted to watch the videos on their computer.

First of all, these videos were designed for the iPod, don&#039;t shoot me. But, as I stated before, Apple will, most likley, introudce a way to download a larger size resolution video, and then convert it when you port it to the iPod.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t adress the fact that people wanted to watch the videos on their computer.</p>
<p>First of all, these videos were designed for the iPod, don&#8217;t shoot me. But, as I stated before, Apple will, most likley, introudce a way to download a larger size resolution video, and then convert it when you port it to the iPod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/comment-page-1/#comment-80081</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 18:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/#comment-80081</guid>
		<description>Look, Apple is smart enough to know that most peoples videos aren&#039;t 320px. Im sure that they are gonna release either a firmware for the iPod that automaticly resizes them, or release a new version for iTunes to resize them. Trust me, no company can overlook something of this magnitude.

About the pricing, I fully agree (from the customers point of view) Look at the price of the Music Videos. $1.99 for mabey a 4min video and sound clip. Now look at the price for the Shows, $1.99 for a whole episode, now if you dont think thats a reasonable price, then may you be slapped with 100 salmon. But, I disagree with Apple, they should have rased the price of the shows. People would still buy them, even if they didnt have an iPod. But, pricing them at $1.99 is going to cost the company a lot of money in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, Apple is smart enough to know that most peoples videos aren&#8217;t 320px. Im sure that they are gonna release either a firmware for the iPod that automaticly resizes them, or release a new version for iTunes to resize them. Trust me, no company can overlook something of this magnitude.</p>
<p>About the pricing, I fully agree (from the customers point of view) Look at the price of the Music Videos. $1.99 for mabey a 4min video and sound clip. Now look at the price for the Shows, $1.99 for a whole episode, now if you dont think thats a reasonable price, then may you be slapped with 100 salmon. But, I disagree with Apple, they should have rased the price of the shows. People would still buy them, even if they didnt have an iPod. But, pricing them at $1.99 is going to cost the company a lot of money in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/comment-page-1/#comment-80043</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/#comment-80043</guid>
		<description>&gt;60gbs of pornography

WOW - How do you accumulate that.

Also, could you email me about the keynotes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;60gbs of pornography</p>
<p>WOW &#8211; How do you accumulate that.</p>
<p>Also, could you email me about the keynotes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/comment-page-1/#comment-80023</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 15:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/#comment-80023</guid>
		<description>Um, lets see, because your paying $1.99 for something that you could get for free on bittorrent in &quot;Dolby-frigging-surroundTHXomgwtfbbq-epic-orgasm-
sounding bass&quot;-or at least better than 320px which sucks ass.  Why are you defending Apples rediculous scam to charge the same for a 3 min music video as they do for a full 1 hr show!!! (i know they edit out the commercials so don&#039;t correct me on that)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, lets see, because your paying $1.99 for something that you could get for free on bittorrent in &#8220;Dolby-frigging-surroundTHXomgwtfbbq-epic-orgasm-<br />
sounding bass&#8221;-or at least better than 320px which sucks ass.  Why are you defending Apples rediculous scam to charge the same for a 3 min music video as they do for a full 1 hr show!!! (i know they edit out the commercials so don&#8217;t correct me on that)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/comment-page-1/#comment-80010</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/#comment-80010</guid>
		<description>So... when are qualtity ring tones going to be avaible? and I&#039;m I don&#039;t want to spend $$ per tone either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; when are qualtity ring tones going to be avaible? and I&#8217;m I don&#8217;t want to spend $$ per tone either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/comment-page-1/#comment-80007</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/#comment-80007</guid>
		<description>my problem is I have 600 music videos. apple commercials and keynotes dating back 15 years and 60gbs of pornography.  i have to reencode all of those to fit the screen insttead of (like photos) iTunes will not just resize them to work on iPod.

at the same rate, i will watch half of &quot;lost&quot; on the iPod and finish it at home i can&#039;t wath a 320 video on even my iBook, seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my problem is I have 600 music videos. apple commercials and keynotes dating back 15 years and 60gbs of pornography.  i have to reencode all of those to fit the screen insttead of (like photos) iTunes will not just resize them to work on iPod.</p>
<p>at the same rate, i will watch half of &#8220;lost&#8221; on the iPod and finish it at home i can&#8217;t wath a 320 video on even my iBook, seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nogz Blogz</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/comment-page-1/#comment-80004</link>
		<dc:creator>Nogz Blogz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2005 14:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/archive/2005/10/4410/#comment-80004</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why is everyone nitpicking 320px video?&lt;/strong&gt;

	Derek over at uneasy silence summed it up nicely, read the quote within the quote&#8230;.
	With the announcement of the new iPod w/ video playback, the notion of 320px videos as being less than adequate has surfaced here and there across the net. Who ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why is everyone nitpicking 320px video?</strong></p>
<p>	Derek over at uneasy silence summed it up nicely, read the quote within the quote&#8230;.<br />
	With the announcement of the new iPod w/ video playback, the notion of 320px videos as being less than adequate has surfaced here and there across the net. Who &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
