<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caller-ID Spoofing for the rest of us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2004/11/1532/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2004/11/1532/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 15:32:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PDXUSA</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2004/11/1532/comment-page-1/#comment-391287</link>
		<dc:creator>PDXUSA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 02:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=1532#comment-391287</guid>
		<description>We have a solution that goes further than caller ID, we actually verify &amp; validate ANI (the billing telephone number) used to make that call so you know for sure who called. 

Our website is:

http://www.pdxusa.net

Once you scan through the details, it will become obvious that our solution is solid, tested and guaranteed.

PDXUSA, a telecommunications provider.

Google pdxusa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have a solution that goes further than caller ID, we actually verify &amp; validate ANI (the billing telephone number) used to make that call so you know for sure who called. </p>
<p>Our website is:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pdxusa.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.pdxusa.net</a></p>
<p>Once you scan through the details, it will become obvious that our solution is solid, tested and guaranteed.</p>
<p>PDXUSA, a telecommunications provider.</p>
<p>Google pdxusa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koiphish</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2004/11/1532/comment-page-1/#comment-18233</link>
		<dc:creator>koiphish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 19:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=1532#comment-18233</guid>
		<description>You should try CovertCall... http://www.covertcall.com/61415</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should try CovertCall&#8230; <a href="http://www.covertcall.com/61415" rel="nofollow">http://www.covertcall.com/61415</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This One</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2004/11/1532/comment-page-1/#comment-16534</link>
		<dc:creator>This One</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2005 03:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=1532#comment-16534</guid>
		<description>For all you that didn&#039;t know, Kevin Mitnick did this by dialing into a PBX that was set to display a different outgoing number (look it up, it is possible) and then dialed out of that and to Leo&#039;s cell. Because he was using the PBX&#039;s dial-tone, it displayed his number as whatever number was programmed into the PBX (in this case his acomplice programmed it to be the White House).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all you that didn&#8217;t know, Kevin Mitnick did this by dialing into a PBX that was set to display a different outgoing number (look it up, it is possible) and then dialed out of that and to Leo&#8217;s cell. Because he was using the PBX&#8217;s dial-tone, it displayed his number as whatever number was programmed into the PBX (in this case his acomplice programmed it to be the White House).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2004/11/1532/comment-page-1/#comment-15016</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=1532#comment-15016</guid>
		<description>just google &quot;orange box&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just google &#8220;orange box&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobbleGuy</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2004/11/1532/comment-page-1/#comment-14721</link>
		<dc:creator>BobbleGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2005 01:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=1532#comment-14721</guid>
		<description>Not sure why people are paying for this service.  This CallerID spoofing was shown by Kevin Mitnick on live television a while back on The Screen Savers on TechTV.  Although he did not/could not provide exactly what he had dialed before the phone number; he said it is not that hard to find out how to do this spoof by doing a little research on the Internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why people are paying for this service.  This CallerID spoofing was shown by Kevin Mitnick on live television a while back on The Screen Savers on TechTV.  Although he did not/could not provide exactly what he had dialed before the phone number; he said it is not that hard to find out how to do this spoof by doing a little research on the Internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Databit</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2004/11/1532/comment-page-1/#comment-14678</link>
		<dc:creator>Databit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2005 00:46:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=1532#comment-14678</guid>
		<description>Um. CallerID spoofing will not get around most cell phone security. Cell phone companies will look at the ANI (automatic number identification) instead of the CallerID. Caller ID is easily spoofed using a PRI Circuit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um. CallerID spoofing will not get around most cell phone security. Cell phone companies will look at the ANI (automatic number identification) instead of the CallerID. Caller ID is easily spoofed using a PRI Circuit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Operaman</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2004/11/1532/comment-page-1/#comment-14649</link>
		<dc:creator>Operaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2005 17:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=1532#comment-14649</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never researched how callerid works before, but I&#039;ve always assumed it was spoofable.
I&#039;m surprised to hear that there are voicemail services that take that callerid info as authentication.
I guess I&#039;d have to know more about callerid, but I&#039;d suspect the problem isn&#039;t with this service, it&#039;s with the voicemail systems using this not-intended-to-be-secure piece of info for authentication.
But hey, maybe I&#039;m totally wrong and callerid was meant to be secure and unspoofable from the beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never researched how callerid works before, but I&#8217;ve always assumed it was spoofable.<br />
I&#8217;m surprised to hear that there are voicemail services that take that callerid info as authentication.<br />
I guess I&#8217;d have to know more about callerid, but I&#8217;d suspect the problem isn&#8217;t with this service, it&#8217;s with the voicemail systems using this not-intended-to-be-secure piece of info for authentication.<br />
But hey, maybe I&#8217;m totally wrong and callerid was meant to be secure and unspoofable from the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: haw</title>
		<link>http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2004/11/1532/comment-page-1/#comment-14641</link>
		<dc:creator>haw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 06:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uneasysilence.com/?p=1532#comment-14641</guid>
		<description>this is sooo cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is sooo cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
